Abstract
The correlation between shapes, perimeter, and area is crucial in the study of shapes, polygons, and optimization. Historically, its importance can be observed in the classical Isoperimetric Problem, which inquired the maximum area of a shape with a fixed perimeter and was later proven and demonstrated using the isoperimetric inequality, and the tale of Queen Dido, which involves her clever method of maximizing the amount of land with a minimal boundary. In addition, it can provide a deeper conceptual understanding and mathematical knowledge. Although the isoperimetric inequality provides a deep conceptual understanding of shapes and optimization, to further the enrichment of mathematical knowledge and conceptual understanding, this study focuses on the optimization of polygons. This study aims to determine whether there can or cannot exist a polygon, amongst every polygon with the same perimeter, which has the largest area. Through this, it was concluded that there cannot exist such a polygon with a fixed perimeter that had the largest possible area. Instead, it was also concluded that as the area of polygons with the same perimeter approached its upper bound, it approached the shape of a circle with the same perimeter.
Keywords: Convex, Polygon, Convex Hull, Fixed Perimeter, Scaling, Equilateral, Equiangular, Largest Area, Polygons with a Set Perimeter, Base Polygons,
-sided, Derivative
Introduction
The relationship between the area and the perimeter of a polygon is one of the most important concepts in the study of polygons. Its analysis is not only important in mathematics, but it is also historically important, as observed in the classical Isoperimetric Problem1, which considers how to maximize the area of a shape with a fixed perimeter. The tale of Queen Dido is an early example of this applied practically, as she found a clever way to maximize the amount of land with a minimal boundary2. Mathematical knowledge is also of great importance in this topic as students can learn valuable insights. For instance, Heron’s formula, the formula for the area of triangles based on the length of its sides, is an alternative of the formula which utilizes the altitude and the length of its base to find the area, offering the students a deeper, conceptual understanding of mathematics3. By asking students to research the effect of perimeter manipulation (or diameter manipulation) on the properties of different polygons (i.e., triangles, quadrilaterals, and pentagons), one not only adds richness to mathematical reasoning, but also will help students think more about problem-solving and build a stronger base in geometry3. The isoperimetric inequality states that
, where
and
denote the area and perimeter of a shape, respectively, in which equality holds if and only if the shape is a circle4. This implies that, of all the shapes with the same perimeter, the one which has the shape of a circle has the largest area. Despite the isoperimetric inequality truly providing a great understanding of shapes and optimization, to aid in the enrichment of mathematical knowledge, the aim of this study is to focus on polygons and to determine whether or not there existed the polygon with a fixed perimeter that has the maximum area.
The Conjecture
This study aims to prove whether or not there exists a polygon with the largest area amongst every polygon which has the same perimeter. In order for this to be done, the conjecture below must be either proven true or false:
Conjecture 0.0 Suppose there exists a set of every polygon with the same perimeter. Within this set, there exists a polygon with the largest area.
The remainder of this study demonstrates that Conjecture~0.0 is incorrect by first assuming the existence of a polygon which has the largest area within this set and then proving that it cannot actually exist.
The Definitions
Throughout this study, there are many terms that must be defined.
-sided
This is defined as having
sides, where
represents a positive integer.
Equivalence Classes under Similarity
The set of all shapes which have the same shape, regardless of their size, position, or orientation. Hence, the set of shapes that are all similar to one another5.
Convex Polygon
This is defined as a polygon whose interior angles are all smaller than
6.
Convex Hull
The smallest convex set that entirely contains a given set of points or a shape7.
Polygons with a Set Perimeter
This is defined as a set of all polygons with the same perimeter.
The Largest Polygon with a Set Perimeter
This is defined as the polygon with a set perimeter that has the largest area.
Base Polygon
This is defined as a polygon with a perimeter of 1.
The Largest Base Polygon
This is defined as the base polygon with the largest area.
The Proof
Scaling Polygons and Base Polygons
When finding the largest polygon with a set perimeter, the perimeter is a major factor that must be considered. However, it is possible to find the largest polygon with a set perimeter through the scaling of base polygons. Every base polygon can be scaled to match every corresponding similar polygon with a set perimeter.

Suppose there exists a
-sided convex polygon, denoted polygon
, and an
-sided convex polygon, denoted polygon
, where
and
.

and polygon
, where points
, and
are labeled and the diagonals from points
and
to other points within polygon
and polygon
are illustrated, respectively.Let
and
denote the area of polygon
and polygon
, respectively. Additionally, let the perimeter of both polygons be 1. In addition, suppose
is larger than
. Using the sine rule for area8, the equations of
and
are shown below:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[A = \sum_{k=2}^{n-1} \frac{1}{2}(A_1A_k)(A_1A_{k+1})\sin\angle A_k A_1 A_{k+1}\]](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-6cd378e2dfe9c2d1faff94850c6bf593_l3.png)
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[B = \sum_{k=2}^{m-1} \frac{1}{2}(B_1B_k)(B_1B_{k+1})\sin\angle B_k B_1 B_{k+1}\]](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-ce3be882cdb15e04ae34fcdd1c9d7301_l3.png)
Suppose there exists an
-sided convex polygon, denoted polygon
, which is an element of the equivalence class under similarity which includes polygon
and has a perimeter of
, where
. In addition, let the length of
be
times the length of
, for unequal arbitrary integers
and
which are greater than 0 and less than
. As polygon
is similar to polygon
,
must be equal to
, for unequal arbitrary integers
,
, and
which are greater than 0 and less than
.

scaling to match polygon
, where points
, and
are labeled and the diagonals from points
and
to other points within polygon
and polygon
are illustrated, respectively.Suppose there also exists an
-sided convex polygon, denoted polygon
, which is an element of the equivalence class under similarity which includes polygon
and also has a perimeter of
. In addition, let the length of
be
times the length of
, for unequal arbitrary integers
and
which are greater than 0 and less than
. Similarly, as polygon
is similar to polygon
,
must be equal to
, for unequal arbitrary integers
,
, and
which are greater than 0 and less than
.

scaling to match polygon
, where points
, and
are labeled and the diagonals from points
and
to other points within polygon
and polygon
are illustrated, respectivelyLet
and
denote the area of polygon
and polygon
, respectively. Using the sine rule for area8, the equations of
and
are shown below:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[C = \sum_{k=2}^{n-1} \frac{1}{2}(C_1C_k)(C_1C_{k+1})\sin\angle C_k C_1 C_{k+1}\]](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-a984d72b63411aa6d03f9a779c1e12d1_l3.png)
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[D = \sum_{k=2}^{m-1} \frac{1}{2}(D_1D_k)(D_1D_{k+1})\sin\angle D_k D_1 D_{k+1}\]](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-4cd7647371575c81315c50e2e43b86ef_l3.png)
These equations can be simplified as shown below:
![]()
![]()
As
is larger than
and
is greater than 0,
is greater than
. Hence,
is greater than
.
For polygons that are not convex, a similar method can be used. Suppose
is a base polygon which is not convex.
can be divided into
amount of triangles, denoted
9. Therefore, the area of
is the sum of the areas of
.

and an illustration, where
is equal to 6, of the division of
into 6 triangles, labeled
, and 
Suppose
is a polygon with a perimeter of
and is an element of the equivalence class under similarity which includes
. In addition, let
be triangles which are an element of the equivalence class under similarity containing
, respectively. In addition, for every integer value of
between 1 and
, let the perimeter of
be
times the perimeter of
. Similarly to how
was divided into
,
can also be divided into
. Therefore, the area of
is the sum of the areas of
.

and an illustration, where
is equal to 6, of the division of
into 6 triangles, labeled
, and 
Similarly to as shown above, for every integer value of
between 1 and
, the area of
is
times the area of
. Therefore, the area of
is
times the area of
. Suppose
is a base polygon which has a smaller area than
and
is a polygon with a perimeter of
and is an element of the equivalence class under similarity which includes
. The area of
would be
times the area of
similarly to how the area of
is
times the area of
. As the area of
is greater than the area of
, the area of
must be greater than the area of
.
Therefore, if a base polygon has a greater area than another base polygon, a polygon that is similar to the former base polygon must have a greater area than a polygon with the same perimeter that is similar to the latter base polygon.
Furthermore, it can be proven that the largest polygon with a set perimeter is similar to the largest base polygon. The largest base polygon has a greater area than every other base polygon. Let
denote the equivalence class under similarity which contains the largest base polygon. As every base polygon can be scaled to match every polygon with a set perimeter that is an element of the same equivalence class under similarity, the polygon with a set perimeter that is an element of
must have a larger area compared to the polygons with the same perimeter which are not elements of
. In short, the largest polygon with a set perimeter must be an element of the equivalence class under similarity which contains the largest base polygon.
Thus, if it can be proven that the largest base polygon does not exist, there cannot exist an equivalence class under similarity which contains the largest base polygon. Furthermore, this would also prove that the largest polygon with a set perimeter cannot exist as well, disproving Conjecture~0.0. Hence, the remainder of this paper intends to demonstrate that the largest base polygon cannot exist in order to disprove Conjecture~0.0.
The Method of Elimination
There are an infinite number of base polygons that can have different side lengths, interior angles, and number of sides. Comparing the area of every base polygon to one another to determine the largest base polygon is not a feasible method because of this. For this reason, there must be a more efficient method to distinguish the polygons that cannot be the largest base polygon.
Theorem 0.1 Suppose there is a set, denoted as
, which consists of all the
-sided base polygons that satisfy a certain property. If it is possible to prove the existence of a
-sided base polygon with a larger area for each element of
using this property, it can be proven that the largest
-sided base polygon does not have this property.
Suppose
is the set of all the
-sided base polygons that satisfy a certain property. Additionally, for every element of
, suppose this property can be utilized to prove the existence of a
-sided base polygon that has a larger area. Consequently, every element of
cannot be the largest
-sided base polygon because there exists a
-sided base polygon with a larger area. Correspondingly, the largest base polygon cannot be an element of
. As the largest base polygon is not an element of
, it must not satisfy this certain property, proving Theorem 0.1.
In the remainder of this paper, it is proven that the largest base polygon cannot possess certain properties by proving that, for each base polygon with those properties, there exists a base polygon with a larger area. Hence, Theorem~0.1 can be used to efficiently narrow down the possibilities through the elimination of every base polygon that satisfies certain properties that prevents them from being the largest base polygon.
Non-Convex Polygons
Theorem 1.0 The largest
-sided base polygon is convex.
Let polygon
be a
-sided base polygon which is not convex.
must be more than 3 because all triangles are convex as the three interior angles of a triangle are all less than
10. (
)
In addition, suppose the convex hull of polygon
is denoted as
. Let
and
be two different vertices of
which are connected to each other by an edge of
. However, suppose
and
are not connected by an edge within polygon
. Hence,
must be greater than
. (
)
As
and
are vertices of
and
and
are connected by an edge of
, points
must be within the interior of
.

that focuses on vertices
, and
and includes the convex hull of polygon
, which is denoted as 
Let points
be the reflection of points
across line
, respectively. In addition, let
denote polygon
.

that focuses on vertices
, and
, includes the convex hull of polygon
, which is denoted as
, and illustrates polygon
, where points
and
are labeledPoints
excluding points
and
are on the opposite side of points
across line
as
, which contains points
, are all on the same side of line
, excluding points
and
. Therefore, polygon
and polygon
meet at common vertices
and
.
Let
,
,
, and
denote the perimeter and area of polygon
and the perimeter and area of
, respectively. As points
are the reflection of points
across line
, respectively, the perimeter and area of polygon
must be the same as the perimeter and area of
, which is
and
, respectively. Points
are within the interior of
. Therefore, the area of polygon
is the area of polygon
subtracted by the area of
, which is
. Let
denote polygon
.
and polygon
share the same edge, which is
. Therefore, the area of
is the area of polygon
plus the area of
, which is
. Thus,
has a larger area than polygon
. In addition, the perimeter of polygon
can be represented as
. Similarly, the perimeter of
can be represented as
. As polygon
is a base polygon and has the same perimeter as
,
must have a perimeter of 1.
In conclusion, for every
-sided base polygon which is not convex, there exists a
-sided base polygon which has a larger area. Utilizing Theorem~0.1, it can be proven that the largest
-sided base polygon is convex, proving Theorem~1.0.
Triangles and Equilateral Polygons
Theorem 1.1 Suppose there is a non-equilateral triangle
in which
and
are unequal. In addition to this triangle, there exists an isosceles triangle in which the base of the isosceles triangle has the length of
and the two equal sides have the length of the mean of the lengths of
and
. It can be proven that this isosceles triangle has a larger area than
.
Suppose there is a triangle
with a perimeter of
. Within
,
has a length of
, the length of
is denoted as
, and
has an angle of
radians. In addition,
and
are constants (
).

that includes
, which has an angle of
radians, the length of
, which is
, and the length of
, which is 
The triangle inequality states that the sum of the length of any two arbitrary sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the remaining side11. Because of this, the following inequalities can be formed as shown below:

As the perimeter of
, the length of
, and the length of
are
,
, and
, respectively, the length of
must be
, which must also be positive. Using this, the three inequalities can be altered and simplified as shown below:

Therefore,
is greater than 0 and less than
and
is greater than
and less than
. In addition, as
is a triangle,
must be less than
. Thus,
must be less than
.
Let
be the function for the area of
.
can be written as shown below:
![]()
The absolute value of
,
, is defined as follows12:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[|x| = \begin{cases} x & \text{if } x \geq 0 \\ -x & \text{if } x < 0 \end{cases}\]](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-ed5fcaaf8f8ea94f1d0e5ecea65d7793_l3.png)
As the square root function always gives non-negative values for real numbers, the value of
is
when
is more than or equal to 0 and
when
is less than 0. Therefore,
is equal to
. As
can be simplified to
, it is equal to
. As the sine of
is positive because
is greater than 0 and less than
,
is equal to the sine of
. Therefore,
is equal to the sine of
. Thus,
can be altered as shown below:
![]()
To represent the area of
as a function of
, the cosine of
must also be represented as a function of
. Using the law of cosines8, the cosine of
can be written as shown below:
![]()
As the cosine of
can be represented as a function of
, the formula for the area of
can also be written as a function of
as shown below:

For the value of
in which
has the maximum value,
must also have its maximum value because
is constant. Using the bounds of
, the following inequalities can be proven:
![]()
Thus,
has a maximum of
, which is when
is equal to
because
would be equal to 0, allowing
to equal
which is equal to
. Therefore, the following inequality in which
has the maximum value when
is equal to
can be shown below:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[S(x) = \frac{1}{4}\sqrt{p(p-2a)}\sqrt{-4\!\left(x-\tfrac{p-a}{2}\right)^2+a^2} \;\leq\; \frac{1}{4}a\sqrt{p(p-2a)} \qquad \left(\text{Equal when } x = \tfrac{p-a}{2}\right)\]](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-5c6fc07afd5092c16aac6fdab6e8c7b2_l3.png)
Hence, when
is
,
has a maximum area of
. Furthermore, when
is
,
and
both have equal lengths of
, causing it to be an isosceles triangle. Thus, if there is a non-equilateral triangle
in which
and
are not equal, there exists an isosceles triangle with the same perimeter as
and a base with the length of
which has a larger area than
, proving Theorem~1.1.
Theorem 1.1: The largest
-sided base polygon is a convex equilateral
-sided base polygon.
Theorem 1.1 demonstrates that there exists a 3-sided base polygon with a larger area for every non-equilateral 3-sided base polygon. To prove the existence of a
-sided base polygon with a larger area for every non-equilateral
-sided base polygon with at least 4 sides, let’s suppose that there is a convex non-equilateral
-sided base polygon, referred to as polygon
, in which
and
are two arbitrary adjacent sides that do not have the same length (
,
).
To prove that there exists a
-sided base polygon that has a larger area compared to polygon
, polygon
must first be divided into two separate polygons, triangle
and polygon
. As
and
do not have the same lengths, using Theorem~1.1, it can be proven that there exists an isosceles triangle with a larger area which has a base with the length of
and the same perimeter as
. Let’s denote this isosceles triangle as triangle
in which
is the base of the isosceles triangle. A new
-sided polygon can be composed by shifting the position and rotating
so that
coincides with
and vertex
is not on the interior or the boundary of polygon
. The new polygon can be referred to as polygon
. As
has a larger area compared to
, polygon
has a larger area compared to polygon
. In addition, the sum of the lengths of
and
is equal to the sum of the lengths of
and
because the perimeter of both polygons is equal and
and
both have the same lengths. This reveals that polygon
is also a base polygon because it has the same perimeter as polygon
.
In short, for every convex non-equilateral
-sided base polygon, there exists a
-sided base polygon with a larger area. Theorem~1.0 states that the largest
-sided base polygon must be convex. Thus, using Theorem~0.1, it can be proven that the largest
-sided base polygon is equilateral. Hence, the largest
-sided base polygon is a convex equilateral
-sided base polygon, proving Theorem~1.2.
Quadrilaterals and Equiangular Polygons
Theorem 2.1 Suppose there is a convex quadrilateral
in which
,
, and
all have the same length and
and
do not have the same angles. In addition to
, there exists a convex quadrilateral, denoted
, in which the lengths of
,
, and
all equal the length of
, the length of
equals the length of
, and
has the same angle as
. It can be proven that
has a larger area than
.
Suppose there is a convex quadrilateral
with a perimeter of
. Additionally,
has a length of
and the lengths of
,
, and
all equal
(
,
).

that includes
, which has an angle of
,
, which has an angle of
,
, the length of
, which is
, and the length of
, which is 
To find the angle of
when
has the largest area, suppose the length of
is denoted as
,
has an angle of
, and
has an angle of
(
,
,
).
Using the law of cosines8, the square of
can be written as shown below:
![]()
Using the equation for the square of
, the equation for the cosine of
can be derived as shown below:
![]()
As the cosine of
can be represented as a function of
, the formula for the area of
can also be written as a function of
. Let
be the function for the area of
.
can be written as shown below:
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
The derivative of
can be written as shown below:

Suppose the value of
is
radians when
is equal to zero. For the values of
that are more than 0 radians and less than
radians, if the value of
is smaller than
radians,
is positive. However, if the value of
is greater than
radians,
is negative. As anticipated, when the value of
is
radians,
is equal to zero. This property of
holds true for all permissible values of the constants
and
.

, in which
is more than 0 radians and less than
radians, for different permissible values of the constants
and 
Therefore, for the values of
that are more than 0 radians and less than
radians,
is strictly increasing. Similarly, for the values of
that are more than
radians and less than
radians,
is strictly decreasing. For this reason,
has a maximum value if and only if the value of
is
radians. As
represents the function for the area of
for the values of
that are more than 0 radians and less than
radians,
must be determined to find the value of
at which
has the maximum area. As
is the value of
when
is equal to zero,
is equal to zero.



![]()
![]()
To eliminate the square root from the right side of the equation above, both sides of the equation can be squared and then simplified as shown below:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \begin{align<em>} &\left(2a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \left(a^2-\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\right)^2\sin^2\beta \ &= \cos^2\beta\left(-4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta + 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2-\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta - a^4 + 2a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2 + 3\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^4\right) \[6pt] &\left(2a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\right)^2\sin^2\beta \ &= \left(4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2\right)(1 - \cos^2\beta) \ &= 4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2 \ &\quad - 4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^4\beta + 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos^3\beta - \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2\cos^2\beta \[6pt] &= \cos^2\beta\left(-4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta + 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta - a^4 + 2a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2 + 3\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^4\right) \ &= -4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^4\beta + 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos^3\beta + \left(-a^4 + 2a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2 + 3\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^4\right)\cos^2\beta \[6pt] &4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2 - \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2\cos^2\beta \ &= \left(-a^4 + 2a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2 + 3\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^4\right)\cos^2\beta \[6pt] &4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2 \ &\quad - \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2\cos^2\beta + \left(a^4 - 2a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2 - 3\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^4\right)\cos^2\beta = 0 \[6pt] &4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2 \ &\quad - \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2\cos^2\beta + \left(a^4 - 2a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2 - 3\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^4\right)\cos^2\beta \ &= \left(4a^2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2 - 4\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^4\right)\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2 \ &= 4\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)^2 \ &= \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\left(4\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\right) \ &= \frac{1}{9}\left(-p^2 + 2ap + 8a^2\right)\left(4\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\cos^2\beta - 4a\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta + \left(a^2 - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)^2\right)\right) \ &= \frac{1}{9}(4a-p)(2a+p)\left(2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \left(a - \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\right)\right)\left(2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \left(a + \left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\right)\right) \ &= \frac{1}{9}(4a-p)(2a+p)\left(2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \frac{4a-p}{3}\right)\left(2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \frac{p+2a}{3}\right) = 0 \[6pt] &(4a-p)\left(2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \frac{4a-p}{3}\right)\left(2\left(\frac{p-a}{3}\right)\cos\beta - \frac{p+2a}{3}\right) = 0 \end{align</em>}](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-4e54cd93e1e076bf29ee07f3f8d7ab8f_l3.png)
Based on the final equation,
seems to be equal to zero when
is equal to
or the cosine of
is equal to
or
. However, during one of the stages of the simplification process, both sides of the equation were squared. So, all the potential solutions must be verified.
In the case in which the cosine of
is equal to
, the sine of
can be written as shown below:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[\sin\theta = \sqrt{1-\cos^2\theta} = \sqrt{1-\left(\frac{4a-p}{2(p-a)}\right)^2} = \frac{\sqrt{4(p-a)^2-(4a-p)^2}}{2(p-a)} = \frac{\sqrt{3p^2-12a^2}}{2(p-a)}\]](https://nhsjs.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-2f4f52880f30d8ca06975581caa38c65_l3.png)
As
is more than 0 radians and less than
radians, the sine of
is positive13. Using the sine of
, the value of
is shown below:

Thus,
is equal to zero when the cosine of
is equal to
.
In the case in which the cosine of
is equal to
, the sine of
can be written as shown below:
![]()
As
is more than 0 radians and less than
radians, the sine of
is positive13. Using the sine of
, the value of
is shown below:

Thus,
is not equal to zero when the cosine of
is equal to
.
In the case in which
is equal to
, the equation for the value of
is shown below:

For
to equal zero in the case in which
is equal to
, the cosine of
must be zero. Coincidentally, in the case in which
is equal to
,
is equal to zero. So, when
is equal to
,
is equal to zero if and only if the cosine of
is equal to
.
After evaluating all the potential solutions,
is equal to zero if and only if the cosine of
is equal to
. So,
has a maximum area if and only if the value of
is the inverse cosine of
.
Using the equation for the cosine of
, when the value of
is the inverse cosine of
, the value of the cosine of
is as shown below:

Thus, when the value of
is the inverse cosine of
, the value of the cosine of
is the additive inverse of the cosine of
. As both
and
have a value that is more than 0 radians and less than
radians, the value of
is
radians subtracted by the value of
. So, the sum of the values of
and
is
radians. Hence, the sum of
and
is
.
As the sum of
and
is
,
is a cyclic quadrilateral. Let the circumcenter of
be referred to as point
.

, which includes
(angle
),
(angle
), and the length of
(
), and a visual representation of the circumcircle of
, which includes the circumcenter
and 
,
, and
are all congruent isosceles triangles because
,
, and
all have the same length and
,
,
, and
all have the same length. Thus,
,
,
,
,
, and
all have the same angles. As the sum of
and
is
and the sum of
and
is
,
has the same angle as
.
In short, when the cosine of
is
in which the area of
is at its maximum,
and
also have the same angles.
Thus, if there is a convex quadrilateral
in which
,
, and
all have the same lengths and
and
do not have the same angle, there exists a convex quadrilateral with a larger area, denoted
, in which the lengths of
,
, and
all equal the length of
, the length of
is equal to the length of
, and
has the same angle as
, proving Theorem~2.1.
Theorem 2.2 The largest
-sided base polygon is the regular
-sided base polygon.
Theorem 1.2 affirms that the largest
-sided base polygon is an equilateral
-sided base polygon. As the equilateral 3-sided base polygon is the regular 3-sided base polygon, the largest 3-sided base polygon is the regular 3-sided base polygon.
For every convex non-equiangular equilateral 4-sided base polygon, Theorem~2.1 demonstrates that there exists a 4-sided base polygon with a larger area. To prove the existence of a
-sided base polygon with a larger area for every convex non-equiangular equilateral
-sided base polygon with at least 5 sides, let’s suppose that there is a convex non-equiangular equilateral
-sided polygon, referred to as polygon
, in which
and
are two arbitrary adjacent angles that do not have the same angle (
,
).
To prove that there exists a
-sided base polygon that has a larger area compared to polygon
, polygon
must first be divided into two separate polygons, quadrilateral
and polygon
. Quadrilateral
must be convex because
and
are both less than
and
and
are also less than
because they are smaller than
and
, which are both smaller than
, respectively. As quadrilateral
is convex and
and
do not have the same angle, using Theorem~2.1, it can be proven that there exists a convex quadrilateral with a larger area, denoted quadrilateral
, in which the lengths of
,
, and
all equal the length of
, the length of
is equal to the length of
, and
has the same angle as
. A new
-sided polygon can be composed by shifting the position and rotating
so that
coincides with
and vertex
and vertex
are not on the interior or the boundary of polygon
. The new
-sided polygon can be referred to as polygon
. As
has a larger area compared to
, polygon
has a larger area compared to polygon
. In addition, as the lengths of
,
, and
are all equal to the length of
, polygon
is also a base polygon because it has the same perimeter as polygon
.
In short, for every convex non-equiangular equilateral
-sided base polygon with at least 4 sides, there exists a
-sided base polygon with a larger area. Theorem~1.2 states that the largest
-sided base polygon must be a convex equilateral base polygon. Thus, using Theorem~0.1, it can be proven that the largest
-sided base polygon with at least 4 sides is regular. Hence, the largest
-sided base polygon is the regular
-sided base polygon, proving Theorem~2.2.
Regular Polygons and the Circle
Theorem~2.2 affirms that the largest base polygon is a regular polygon. However, to find the largest base polygon, the area of every regular base polygon must be compared. Suppose there is a regular
-sided base polygon
. In addition, point
is the center of polygon
,
has an angle of
, and point
is the midpoint of
. As
is an isosceles triangle,
has an angle of
(
).

that focuses on center
and vertices
, and
and includes
(angle
), point
, and
(
)The equation for the value of
in radians can be written as shown below:
![]()
Using the equation for the value of
, the function for the area of polygon
, denoted
, can be written as shown below:
![]()
Let
be defined as shown below:
![]()
The derivative of
can be written as shown below:

The inequality shown below is true for all
greater than 0 and less than
14:
![]()
This inequality can be rearranged and altered as shown below:
![]()
For every value of
in which
is more than or equal to 3,
is greater than 0 and less than
. Therefore, using the above inequality, it can be proven that
is less than 1 because the sine of
is smaller than
for every value of
in which
is more than or equal to 3. As a result,
has a positive value. In addition,
and the sine of
are also positive. Thus,
is positive for every value of
in which
is more than or equal to 3. So,
is a strictly increasing function for every value of
greater than or equal to 3. So, for every
more than or equal to 3,
is more than
. As
is equal to
,
is more than
for every value of
in which
is an integer more than or equal to 3. Therefore, as the number of sides in a regular base polygon increases, the area also increases. This insinuates that the largest base polygon does not exist because the number of sides can increase indefinitely.
In addition, to determine whether
converges or diverges, the limit of
as
approaches infinity must be evaluated, as shown below:
![]()
As
would approach 1 as
approaches 015,
would equal
. Hence,
converges to
as
approaches infinity.
![]()
Utilizing the Hausdorff metric and perimeter-area convergence16, it is possible to show that polygon
converges to the shape of a circle as
approaches infinity.
Suppose
is a circle with a perimeter of 1 which has point
as its center. Let
and
denote the set of all points on polygon
and
, respectively. Then, as
approaches infinity,
converges to
in the Hausdorff metric as shown below:
![]()
For all
, the perimeters satisfy:
![]()
Hence, the perimeter of polygon
and
are both 1. Similarly to how
converges to
as
approached infinity,
would also converge to
as
approached infinity as
is equal to
. Thus, as
approaches infinity, the area of polygon
approaches
. As the perimeter of
is 1, it would have a radius of
. This means that the area of
is
. Therefore, as
approaches infinity, the area of polygon
approaches the area of
.
![]()
Thus, polygon
converges to a circle with a perimeter of 1 as
approaches infinity.
In conclusion, the largest base polygon does not exist. Therefore, the largest polygon with a set perimeter cannot exist because the equivalence class under similarity which contains the largest base polygon cannot exist. Hence, Conjecture~0.0 has been proven false because it stated that there did exist a polygon with the largest area, which is incorrect.
Thus, within a set of every polygon with the same perimeter, there cannot exist a polygon within this set which has the largest area. However, it has also been demonstrated that as the area of these polygons approaches its upper bound, it approaches the shape of a circle with the same perimeter.
Conclusion
In conclusion, many steps were taken to disprove the existence of a convex polygon with a fixed perimeter that has the maximum area. First, a conjecture, which stated there did exist a polygon with a fixed perimeter which also had the maximum area, was formed in order to be disproven. Next, using the scaling of polygons, it was demonstrated that such a polygon had to be similar to the shape of the polygon with a perimeter of 1 that has the largest area. Then, it had to be proven that the polygon with a perimeter of 1 that had the largest area had to also be convex. To determine whether the polygon with a perimeter of 1 that has the largest area is a convex equilateral polygon, it was proven that every convex non-equilateral convex polygon with a perimeter of 1 could not have the maximum area. Similarly, after proving that every convex non-equiangular equilateral polygon with a perimeter of 1 could not have the maximum area, it revealed that this polygon is a regular polygon. Finally, the areas of all of the regular polygons with a perimeter of 1 were compared to find the convex polygon with a perimeter of 1 that has the largest area. However, as the number of sides in the regular polygons increased, its area also continued to increase and approached a value of
, which is the area of the circle with a perimeter of 1. Thus, the polygon with a fixed perimeter that has the largest possible area does not exist because the area of a polygon can continue to increase as its shape approaches the shape of a circle with the same perimeter, disproving the conjecture.
References
- A, Bogomolny. Isoperimetric theorem and inequality. Accessed June 20, 2025. http://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/isoperimetric.shtml [↩]
- Dido’s problem. Accessed June 20, 2025. from http://mathematica.ludibunda.ch/areas.html [↩]
- B. Engelker. Area and perimeter of polygons. MAT Exam Expository Papers. 11, 1-15, 2006. [↩] [↩]
- R. Osserman. The isoperimetric inequality. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 84(6), 1182-1238. 1978. [↩]
- D. Collins. Math 4310 handout-equivalence relations, 1-4. Accessed February 10, 2026. https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~dcollins/math4310/EquivalenceRelations.pdf [↩]
- J.-L. De Carufel, A. Dumitrescu, W. Meulemans, T. Ophelders, C. Pennarun, C. D. Tóth, & S. Verdonschot. Convex polygons in Cartesian products. Journal of Computational Geometry 11(2), 205-233, 2021, doi: 10.20382/jocg.v11i2a9. [↩]
- M. de Berg, O. Cheong, M. van Kreveld, & M. Overmars. Computational geometry: Algorithms and applications (3rd ed.), Springer, 2008. [↩]
- R. Larson, & R. P. Hostetler. Trigonometry (7th ed.), Brooks/Cole ISE, 2006. [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩]
- M. R. Garey, D. S. Johnson, F. P. Preparata, & R. E. Tarjan. Triangulating simple polygon. Information Processing Letters 7(4), 175-179, 1977. [↩]
- A. Barvinok. A course in convexity, American Mathematical Society 54, 2002. [↩]
- M. A. Khamsi, & W. A. Kirk. An introduction to metric spaces and fixed point theory, John Wiley & Sons, 2001. [↩]
- J. Stewart. Single variable calculus: Early transcendentals (6th ed.), Thomson, 2008. [↩]
- M. Corral. Trigonometry. Schoolcraft College, 2009. [↩] [↩]
- T. M. Apostol. Calculus: One-variable calculus, with an introduction to linear algebra (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, 1967. [↩]
- T. Sandesh, & H. S. Bishnu. An extension of the sandwich theorem for two-sided limits. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology 19(3), 1-3, 2025. [↩]
- L. C. Evans, & R. F. Gariepy. Measure theory and fine properties of functions. CRC Press, 1992. [↩]


, and
and includes 

and
and includes
,
, and 



