Is Pakistan on the Brink of a Green Transport Revolution, Or Are Its Efforts Lagging Behind the World’s Leaders in Sustainable Travel, Leaving A Larger Carbon Footprint in Its Wake?

0
472

Abstract

Transportation is a pivotal driver of economic growth in Pakistan. However, transportation is not only a key contributor to greenhouse gas emissions but also exacerbates environmental and climate issues. This study evaluates Pakistan’s sustainable transport initiatives, focusing on government policies promoting electric vehicles and green infrastructure. The study identifies key challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, financial constraints, and low public awareness, and proposes strategies for overcoming these barriers. The research employs a comparative analysis with international benchmarks and highlights the need for integrated strategies, smart technologies, and public-private partnerships. Key findings indicate that while there are notable government efforts, substantial improvements are needed in policy execution, infrastructure development, and public engagement. Limitations in understanding Pakistan’s transportation sector include a lack of current data on vehicle usage and transportation emissions, and insufficient long-term studies on policy impacts. Addressing these gaps through enhanced data collection, comprehensive impact analyses, and context-specific research is essential for advancing Pakistan’s sustainable transportation sector and aligning with global standards.

Keywords: Economic Growth, Transportation Sector, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Government Initiatives, Sustainable Transport, Environmental Impact.

Introduction

Transportation has been a crucial engine of economic growth by enabling trade, urban development, and sector connectivity123. Therefore, transport remains essential for the movement of goods and people at local, regional, and global levels456. Modern civilization relies heavily on transportation for fostering social cohesion and economic efficiency7. The various definitions of sustainability and the range of viewpoints contribute to sustainability’s complexity8. Moreover, the key aspects include the critique and assessment of sustainability and transportation’s impact on environmental, social, and economic factors8. Additionally, the distinction between goals and objectives, reliance on, and sustainable transportation solutions are also essential components9.

Pakistan’s transportation industry is regarded as the primary driver of economic growth and development10. Sohail et al. (2021) demonstrates that transport industry produces 6% of job possibilities in Pakistan and contributes 10% of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The transportation sector is a key focus in discussions about greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and air pollution due to significant contributions to global warming and environmental degradation1112.

This study specifically examines the case of Pakistan, a developing country that is facing the challenges of rapid urbanization and increasing greenhouse gas emissions12. The latest data from the World Bank (2021) indicates that Pakistan’s transportation sector makes approximately 23% contribution to the country’s total carbon emissions which are approximately 52.2 million metric tons12.Recent data indicates that the transportation sector actually emits about 52.9 million metric tons, constituting around 31% of Pakistan’s total emissions, which are approximately 170 million metric tons1310 . For instance, Pakistan’s transportation sector relies heavily on fossil fuels such as petrol and diesel. The combustion of these fuels in vehicles releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO₂) and other greenhouse gases. This issue can be mostly attributed to the significant reliance on conventional fossil fuel vehicles and inadequate infrastructure12.

Researchers, policymakers, and industry practitioners have given sustainable transport a great deal of attention14. This focus is partly based on research on sustainable development14. Environmental, social, and economic sustainability are the three components of sustainability that are generally acknowledged14. The pressing need to resolve the issue highlights the nation’s adherence to international environmental accords, like the Paris Agreement15. Moreover, the Paris Agreement mandates significant decreases in carbon emissions for example 50% by 20307. Thus, the transport sector in Pakistan, while pivotal for economic growth and societal connectivity, faces significant environmental challenges due to its carbon emissions. Addressing these challenges is imperative for aligning economic development with global sustainability goals, necessitating comprehensive strategies and investments in green transport infrastructure.

This paper aims at assessing the current state of sustainable transport initiatives in Pakistan, identify key challenges hindering their progress, and propose strategies for overcoming these barriers. Specifically, the research seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of government policies and initiatives in promoting electric vehicle adoption and sustainable transport infrastructure. Moreover, the research analyses the financial, political, and societal factors influencing the implementation of sustainable transport solutions in Pakistan. Furthermore, the research compares Pakistan’s progress in sustainable transport with global benchmarks, and identify areas for improvement. Additionally, the paper aims to propose recommendations based on best practices from other countries to enhance Pakistan’s transition towards a sustainable transport sector.

Section 2 presents a structured literature review with distinct sub-themes related to sustainable transport. Each sub-theme evaluates key findings, theories, and methodologies, highlighting their contributions and establishing a foundation for understanding the sustainable transport. While the study focuses primarily on Pakistan, lessons drawn from international best practices will be used to frame the recommendations. Section 3 critically examines concerns, limitations, and main research gaps identified within the existing literature on sustainable transport. Moreover, the research addresses the shortcomings and biases of current studies on sustainable transport in Pakistan while articulating the unresolved questions motivating this research. Finally, section 4 synthesizes the findings from the literature review on sustainable transport, offering conclusions that summarize key insights and implications for theory, practice, or policy. The study also provides recommendations for future research directions on sustainable transport, emphasizing the study’s potential contributions to advancing knowledge in the field and concluding with reflections on the study’s broader impact.

Literature Review

The Role of Transport Infrastructure in Pakistan’s Carbon Footprint

Transportation serves as a critical component of modern civilization by enhancing economic efficiency and fostering social cohesion12. However, transportation simultaneously represents a significant global issue due to its substantial carbon emissions. Indeed, carbon emissions are a major contributor to climate change and environmental degradation, thereby highlighting its negative impact despite its positive roles. However, transportation simultaneously represents a significant global issue due to substantial carbon emissions, which are a major contributor to climate change and environmental degradation, thereby highlighting the negative impact despite the positive roles of transportation167. Pakistan’s total carbon emissions approximately 170 million metric tons (MMT) of carbon dioxide, and the transportation sector contributing about 52.9 million metric tons (MMT), or 31%, of this total17,12. Transportation that satisfies present-day transportation and mobility demands without endangering the capacity of future generations is referred to as sustainable transportation18. Planning for urban mobility is becoming increasingly challenging in Pakistan due to the issues associated with environmental sustainability19. Due to the country’s fast urbanisation, population growth, and economic development in recent decades, Pakistan has experienced considerable changes in traffic conditions12

A greater reliance on conventional cars that run on fossil fuels has resulted from the nation’s expanding modernization, raising the demand for transport services12. Pakistan’s transport infrastructure, characterized by outdated road networks, insufficient public transportation options, and inadequate maintenance, struggles to keep pace with this increased demand. This infrastructure gap exacerbates traffic congestion and fuel inefficiency, leading to higher carbon emissions from vehicles. Consequently, Pakistan’s transport sector has emerged as a major source of carbon emissions12. Due to Pakistan’s leading global ranking for vulnerability to climate-related adversities, a green transportation system is needed to mitigate environmental impact and enhance environmental quality10. The country’s efforts to achieve environmental sustainability are seriously hampered by this increase12. Cities’ natural beauty and environment are being adversely affected by the rapidly growing number of automobiles, excessive fuel use, smoke clouds, and dust20. All of these factors have major negative health effects20. Hence, immediate action is required to mitigate environmental and health impacts.

A Review of Transport Policies in Pakistan

International Policies

Many developed and developing nations have created policies (both manufacturer- and customer-oriented) to lessen dependency on fossil fuels and the harmful emissions these fuels produce when they burn in internal combustion (IC) engines21. The policies are made in order to make the transportation sector clean and sustainable21. Despite evolving transport policies in Pakistan aimed at addressing environmental concerns and promoting a sustainable transportation system, the sector continues to consume over 50% of the nation’s petroleum resources22. Moreover, the country has struggled to secure sufficient resources to expedite its transition to a modern and sustainable transport infrastructure23. The business as usual (BAU) scenario suggests that in 2035, the current energy and emissions values will rise if the current socio-economic conditions persist21.

National Policies

Policy 2009 sought to create a transport system that guarantees safe, efficient, reliable, equitable, and environmentally friendly mobility for both people and goods22. This policy was designed to support the government’s objective of enhancing public welfare through advancements in human development, economic growth, and poverty reduction22. Nevertheless, the policy draft highlighted critical issues, including the need for institutional development22.

Under the newly introduced Electric Vehicle Policy 2020, the Government of Pakistan (GOP) has chosen to transition from fossil fuel vehicles to electric vehicles to reduce fuel consumption, cut oil imports, and address related issues22. Recent studies indicate that while the policy has initiated interest in electric vehicles, actual adoption remains low due to inadequate infrastructure, high initial costs, and limited public awareness12. For instance, as of 2023, electric vehicle sales accounted for only 1.5% of total vehicle sales in Pakistan, highlighting the need for enhanced incentives and infrastructure development to support this transition5. Additionally, the GOP is also working with the United Nations Development Program and the Global Environment Facility through the Pakistan Sustainable Transport Project (PAKSTRAN) to advance sustainability in the transport sector19. Several major transit projects have emerged under the PAKSTRAN initiative19. These PAKSTRAN initiative includes the Lahore Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), operational since February 2013, integrating with Lahore Transport Company (LTC) over 27km19. Additionally, one study found that using BRT systems is ten times safer per kilometre than driving a car24,25. Furthermore, research evaluating the Multan BRT system indicates passenger satisfaction linked to safety and accessibility features26. These systems aim to reduce accidents by ensuring better traffic regulation through exclusive lanes and systematic boarding practices27.

Moreover, the Orange Line Metro Train in Lahore, part of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is under construction with 26 stations across 27.1km19. Furthermore, the Islamabad Metro Bus, operational since June 2015, connecting Islamabad and Rawalpindi, with a second phase under construction to reach the New Islamabad International Airport; and the Karachi Green Line, under construction since 2016, establishing a 35km BRT network19.

Moreover, the annual reduction in pollution costs due to the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is about US$0.61 million under the modal shift scenario (4% of passengers) and US$2.45 million under the car ownership scenario (16% of passengers)28. The study highlights that CO2 reductions remain modest due to the limited shift from private car use to the BRT system20. Currently, the Lahore BRT network serves only 1.3% of the travel demand for a population nearing 10 million, emphasizing the need for expansion to other routes within the city20. While the Lahore BRT has had a positive overall impact, it has yet to attract significant commuter participation from more educated or higher-income groups20. The Lahore BRT system reduces pollution costs but struggles to attract higher-income and educated commuters due to barriers in public perception and commuter behaviour2930

Furthermore, the Islamabad Metro Bus project proceeded without conducting the required Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), as mandated by Section 12 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 199731. Although the project’s PC-I document acknowledged potential environmental impacts, authorities failed to gather necessary data to assess these effects accurately32. During construction, contractors significantly damaged parks managed by the Parks and Horticulture Authority in Rawalpindi by using these spaces for constructing girders and dumping materials, leading to environmental degradation32. Responsibility for evaluating the damages and determining appropriate compensation rested with the Rawalpindi Development Authority (RDA) management32. It has been reported that construction began even before the environmental impact assessments were conducted, violating established regulations33. However, no assessments of losses were made, nor was any rehabilitation or maintenance of the parks executed at the contractors’ expense31. Moving forward, it is crucial to calculate and recover rehabilitation costs and rent from those responsible while addressing the RDA management’s negligence in fulfilling its duties.

On the other hand, there is limited data available on the specific environmental impact of the Green Line Karachi. However, similar BRT systems, such as the Lahore BRT, have shown a reduction of approximately 2,300 tons of CO2 emissions annually34. These reductions contribute to Pakistan’s target of reducing emissions by 20% by 2030 under the Paris Agreement. Turning to the Orange Line Metro Train, this project has raised significant socio-environmental concerns, including disruptions to public movement, land acquisition, and environmental degradation. The proposed project may cause disruptions to public movement, land acquisition, pollution, safety risks, and impacts on local routines, water bodies, utilities, and archaeological sites, necessitating mitigation measures35. A study by Alisha et al. (2020) noted that 95% of surveyed residents expressed dissatisfaction due to the loss of greenery and aesthetic degradation caused by the project.36. The transport sector has far-reaching environmental, social, and economic effects on society, making the adoption of sustainable development principles crucial14. The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) has proposed eight key principles for sustainable transportation: Walk (Develop neighbourhoods that promote walking), Cycle (Prioritize non-motorized transport), Connect (Establish extensive networks of boulevards and pathways), Transit (Improve access to high-quality public transport), Mix (Plan for mixed land use), Densify (Enhance density and transit capacity), Compact (Create areas with short distances), and Shift (Increase mobility by managing parking and road use)19.

Regional Policies

Due to urban congestion challenges, Pakistan’s major cities, including Karachi, Lahore, and Rawalpindi-Islamabad, have been working on sustainable transport solutions for several years19. Since 1990, Karachi has undertaken various feasibility studies, implementation plans, and design projects for Light Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems with international support from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Japan International Cooperation Agency19.

In conclusion, Pakistan’s transport policies reflect an ongoing effort to balance environmental sustainability with the growing demand for efficient transportation infrastructure. The transition towards electric vehicles and the development of major transit projects are significant steps towards achieving a cleaner and more sustainable transport sector.

However, a comparative analysis with policies from other countries or regions could provide deeper insights into the effectiveness of Pakistan’s strategies. For instance, examining successful models from countries with advanced sustainable transport systems might highlight best practices and areas for improvement. Despite the detailed nature of the policies, several gaps and shortcomings persist. Issues such as inadequate infrastructure, enforcement challenges, and limited public awareness may hinder the full realization of policy goals. Assessing the success of these policies requires evaluating specific outcomes, such as reductions in carbon emissions, increased adoption of electric vehicles, and improvements in public transportation efficiency. Overall, while Pakistan’s transport policies are a step in the right direction, addressing these gaps and learning from international experiences could enhance their effectiveness and ensure a more sustainable future for the country’s transport sector.

MetricPakistan (2010)Pakistan (2018)Standard/Goal (2010)Comparison CountryComparison Value (2020)
Passenger Traffic (billion km)239322.7Increase by 3% annuallyIndia1,000
Freight Traffic (billion ton-km)153159Increase by 3% annuallyChina2,000
Road Network Length (km)263,000263,000Aim for expansion 20% by 2025 (approx. additional 52,600 km)USA6,580,000
Road Density (km/sq.km)0.320.32Target of 1.0 km/sq.km by 2025 compared to 0.32 km/sq.km in 2018Germany6.5
Average Travel Time (hours)4536Reduce to under 30Japan12
Table 1: Key metrics of Pakistan’s transportation sector (2010-2018) compared to international standards (2020) (Sources: Government of Pakistan, Finance Division; Pakistan Institute of Development Economics; Asian Development Bank).

Environmental Degradation Worldwide

When addressing the broader issues of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, the transportation sector is unavoidable due to its significant to global warming11. Transport sector is the second largest source of CO2 emissions worldwide and accounts for over a third of the total energy consumption in European Environment Agency member countries37, with the European Union’s transport sector contributing approximately 31% of total greenhouse gas emissions, the United States’ transportation sector responsible for about 29% of total emissions, and China’s transport sector accounting for about 10% of global transport emissions. The advancement of urbanization and motorization has occurred with insufficient government and technological support for sustainable development strategies38. Consequently, the negative externalities of the transport sector have increasingly damaged environmental conditions in urban areas and continue to worsen the quality of life38. The unchecked expansion of vehicle fleets, combined with an aging and poorly maintained vehicle stock, has deteriorated road conditions38. This unchecked expansion of vehicles leads to severe traffic congestion and high levels of air and noise pollution38.

China is experiencing severe environmental degradation, marked by significant air pollution, water shortages, soil contamination, and a decline in biodiversity, all of which threaten public health and hinder sustainable development39. In response, the Chinese government has enacted policies aimed at tackling these issues, including investments in renewable energy and the enhancement of environmental regulations39. Despite these efforts, progress has been slow, and there is a pressing need for more coordinated actions to alleviate the negative impacts of rapid industrial growth and urban expansion on the environment39. Despite efforts to promote electric vehicles and enhance public transit, the large number of cars continues to contribute significantly to air pollution. Similarly, in Pakistani cities like Karachi and Lahore, expanding car fleets and inadequate infrastructure present major challenges for improving air quality. These incidents highlight the necessity of stricter emission regulations as well as expedited sustainable transportation initiatives in order to successfully enhance air quality and combat environmental degradation.

Sustainable Transport Practices Worldwide

To explore effective strategies for sustainable transportation, we must examine successful practices implemented globally. InJuly 2004, individuals came together in Baltimore, Maryland, United States, for the Conference on Integrating Sustainability into the Transportation Planning Process4041. The individuals highlighted a broader trend of sustainability efforts across various North American cities and regions, such as the Maryland Smart Growth Initiatives, the Portland, Oregon 2040 Plan, Sustainable San Francisco, Sustainable Toronto, Sustainable Seattle, and The Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development4243 In the United States, the conference was created by a specially designated committee of the National Research Council (NRC) to provide a forum for exchanging ideas about the difficulties and potential solutions associated with the issue discussed40. Moreover, the forum incorporated sustainability considerations into the transportation planning process40. The US is now proposing a sustainable transportation program that will only address car emissions44.

China focusses on a number of variables in the planning phase of sustainable transportation, including routes, emissions, and the kind of transportation utilised45. However, China has given this emphasis on information and investment elements less attention46. In the meantime, planning, information, and investment have not been the priorities for South Korea and Canada46. China has demonstrated its ability to mitigate carbon emissions and improve operational efficiency through the implementation of sustainable transportation methods, including route optimisation and the use of environmentally friendly vehicles. The nation must adopt multimodal transportation infrastructure to cut greenhouse gas emissions and provide affordable options for long-distance cargo47. Last-mile delivery options and collaborative shipping are acknowledged as important strategies for reducing emissions and enhancing operational effectiveness47.

Furthermore, waste reduction, decreased shipping costs, and enhanced storage and transit efficiency are all facilitated by effective packaging design and the use of ecologically friendly materials47. Moreover, China places a high value on educating consumers about appropriate packaging disposal to promote a more sustainable supply chain cycle48. Waste management requires a focus on package innovation and ideal packing sizes49. China’s use of electric vehicles, high-speed rail, intelligent transport systems, transit-oriented development, and renewable energy integration reflects a comprehensive approach to sustainable transportation. These technologies have proven effective in reducing carbon emissions, improving operational efficiency, and addressing the environmental challenges associated with rapid urbanization. As China continues to innovate and scale these solutions, its experiences offer valuable lessons for other countries seeking to develop sustainable and efficient transportation systems.

In Europe, countries each adopted unique methods for sustainable transportation, demonstrating the flexibility of the concept to suit local conditions while adhering to a unified framework50. Germany, for example, developed its sustainability strategy within the European Union framework by implementing local regulations and focusing on qualitative visions supported by quantitative criteria like noise and CO2 reduction51. This strategy emphasizes multimodal and least-cost planning51. Their key principles include minimizing motor trips, shifting to less harmful transport modes, optimizing road capacity, enhancing vehicle technology, and utilizing The Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technologies51.

In Scotland, strategies involve coordinating transportation with land development, prioritizing public and non-motorized transport, and using public education to promote sustainable travel52. Examples of these strategies include Edinburgh’s Travel Wise program and its network of greenways and bike streets51. Sweden’s approach focuses on numerous small, collaborative actions integrated into a broader strategy51. For instance, improving transit efficiency, understanding traveller preferences, removing transit barriers, and enhancing transit infrastructure51.

In conclusion, global sustainability efforts in transportation, such as Germany’s Integrated Transport Strategy, Japan’s Comprehensive Mobility Management, and Sweden’s Vision Zero, reflect a shared commitment to reducing environmental impacts and enhancing urban transit.

CountryKey MetricsStrengthsWeaknesses
Pakistan (2010)– 239 billion passenger km (2010) – 153 billion ton km (2010) – Road density: 0.32 km/sq.km– Predominantly road-based transport (92% passenger, 96% freight) – Recent investments in infrastructure– Low road density compared to developed nations – Heavy reliance on road transport
Germany (2023)– Extensive rail network (over 41,000 km) – High road density (over 1 km/sq.km)– Advanced rail system – Efficient public transport options– Aging infrastructure in some areas – Environmental concerns regarding emissions
China (2023)– Largest road network globally (over 4.8 million km) – Rapid expansion of high-speed rail– Significant investment in infrastructure – High-speed rail connectivity  – Overcrowding in urban areas – Environmental degradation due to rapid development  
United States of America (USA) (2023)– Extensive highway system (over 4 million miles) – Mixed transport modes (road, rail, air)– Diverse transport options – Strong freight transport capabilities– Aging infrastructure – Traffic congestion in major cities
Sweden (2023)– High rail usage (approximately 20% of passenger traffic) – Sustainable transport initiatives– Strong focus on sustainability – Integrated public transport system.  – Higher costs associated with maintenance and sustainability efforts
Table 2: Comparative analysis of transportation sectors in Pakistan (2010), Germany, China, the United States, and Sweden (2023). (Sources: Government of Pakistan, 2023; Federal Statistical Office (Destatis), 2023; National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2023; U.S. Department of Transportation, 2023; Swedish Transport Administration, 2023).

Alternative Policies for Sustainable Development

In Pakistan, achieving sustainable urban road transport necessitates a multifaceted strategy that incorporates developments in vehicle technology, infrastructure construction, and traffic management. Moreover, sustainability also considers the effects on the environment and investigating alternate fuel sources. This plan calls for implementing eco-friendly infrastructure, increasing vehicle efficiency, and using technology advancements. These problems must be addressed with focused investments and regulations to make the transition to a more environmentally friendly transport system that is in line with the national goals for sustainable development. The implementation of these techniques in Pakistan entails the resolution of particular obstacles, including restricted financial resources, deficient infrastructure, and gaps in regulations.

Addressing these problems with focused investments and regulations will enable the transition to a more environmentally friendly transport system that aligns with national goals for sustainable development. Kamran et al. (2019) found broad support for integrating environmental considerations into transportation policy and enhancing public transit. However, Etukudoh et al. (2024) argue that transitioning from a car-centric culture to sustainable transportation requires strong public awareness campaigns and policy measures. Moreover, Khan et al. (2023) stress that government-led initiatives are crucial for educating the public about the environmental impacts of transportation choices and the benefits of carbon-neutral activities.

The proposed policies include the following

Technological Approaches: This approach involves leveraging technological advancements in automobiles, road infrastructure, and traffic management to enhance vehicle fuel efficiency, emission control, noise reduction, congestion management, and highway safety audits53. Furthermore, significant benefits are expected from the development of intelligent transportation systems53. In conclusion, Pakistan needs to incorporate cutting-edge technologies into its infrastructure, cars, and traffic control systems in order to achieve sustainable urban transportation. Pakistan must develop intelligent transportation systems, reduce pollutants, and improve fuel efficiency. It is imperative to address the financial, infrastructure, and regulatory obstacles to make the shift to a more eco-friendly and effective transportation system. Addressing the financial, infrastructure, and regulatory obstacles is necessary for making the shift to a more eco-friendly and effective transportation system.

Vehicle Technology: Regulatory policies are crucial for producing greener cars5455. These policies will significantly advance sustainable urban road transportation and overcome the challenges of battery technology, alternative fuel production, and autonomous vehicles depending on technological advancements and a dedicated research and development effort5657. The development and adoption of fuel-efficient, environmentally friendly cars with enhanced safety features are seen as key factors in advancing sustainable urban road transportation53. Vehicles that utilize alternative, inexhaustible fuel sources have the potential to promote sustainability53. However, market conditions currently pose challenges to these innovations53. To sum up, regulations are crucial in pushing the creation of more environmentally friendly automobiles and encouraging sustainable urban road mobility. These policies can encourage the use of fuel-efficient, environmentally friendly cars by addressing issues with battery technology, the generation of alternative fuels, and autonomous vehicles. The policies can also nurture breakthroughs through committed research and development. These advances are hampered by the state of the market and they emphasise the necessity of ongoing funding and support for environmentally friendly transportation solutions.

Infrastructure: The rise in privately-owned vehicles, leading to increased traffic congestion and pollution, underscores the need for an efficient, economical, and well-connected public transportation system531255. The system should be developed using advanced technologies, recyclable materials, and safety-focused, environmentally conscious strategies. Achieving infrastructure requires significant investment, long-term planning, and strong government involvement through strategic investments and public-private partnerships565859. Public-private partnerships accelerate the deployment of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and alternative fuel production facilities60. These collaborations bridge the gap between government resources and private sector innovation61.

Integrating smart city technologies, such as real-time data analytics, smart traffic management, and unified ticketing systems, optimizes existing infrastructure62. This approach improves public transportation efficiency, and enhances the overall transportation experience62. Strategic investments in expanding bus and rail networks, along with integrating emerging technologies, are vital for ensuring both efficiency and accessibility55. Maintaining and upgrading current infrastructure is essential for the reliability of public transportation systems, while investments in EV charging infrastructure are crucial for promoting electric vehicle adoption55.

In conclusion, a strong public transport infrastructure strengthened by cutting-edge technologies, recyclable materials, and wise investments is needed to combat the increase in privately owned automobiles. Deploying electric vehicle infrastructure and integrating smart technology are critical public-private collaborations that will maximise transit efficiency and encourage the use of electric vehicles.

Environmental Costs: The collateral environmental damage and long-term impacts on global climate change from car travel are costs not covered by road users53. Still, governments can pave the way for a more affordable and competitive sustainable transportation system by implementing comprehensive measures55. Damage cost and preventative cost approaches can be used to estimate the harm to human health, property, agriculture, etc53. These expenses can be high and ought to be covered by the “polluter pays” theory and calls for the implementation of a carbon price or other such measure53. In conclusion, road users frequently do not bear the externalised costs associated with driving, such as the harm to the environment and long-term climate implications. Governments can promote a more environmentally friendly transport system by enacting comprehensive policies, such as carbon pricing and the “polluter pays” theory. Estimating the costs and benefits of sustainable transportation initiatives will be essential and internalise these costs which include harm to property, agriculture, and health in order to build a more competitive and cost-effective sustainable transportation framework.

Necessary advances in automobiles include improved battery technology, hydrogen fuel cells, autonomous driving systems, and sustainable manufacturing practices to minimize environmental impact and enhance efficiency6364. Targets for the level of advances to be attained include achieving net-zero emissions by 2030-2040, enhancing energy efficiency by 5%, and establishing robust Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure for widespread adoption6564. Pakistan’s efforts towards advancements are reflected in its New Energy Vehicle policy, which promotes local Electric Vehicle manufacturing and infrastructure development. Recent hybrid vehicle launches and the expanding network of charging stations further support this transition towards sustainable transportation6667

To evaluate the feasibility and scalability of proposed solutions for integrating smart technologies and electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure in Pakistan, a systematic analytical framework is essential. This framework can incorporate tools such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which have proven effective in assessing environmental impacts and optimizing infrastructure planning. LCA is a comprehensive method that evaluates the environmental impacts associated with all stages of a product’s life, from raw material extraction through production, use, and disposal. In the context of EVs, LCA can help identify key areas where emissions can be reduced. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) conducted by Zubair et al. (2024) evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the construction and operational phases of a building’s lifecycle. The assessment follows a systematic approach, beginning with the definition of the goal and scope, which includes identifying critical parameters affecting environmental deterioration68. The study employs a comprehensive inventory analysis to quantify energy, material inputs, and emissions across different lifecycle stages69. The impact assessment phase evaluates the contributions of various materials and operational practices to greenhouse gas emissions, revealing that the use of less eco-friendly materials significantly increases overall emissions70. The findings indicate total emissions of 2996 ton CO2 throughout the lifespan of the case study building, with a subsequent re-evaluation showing a reduction to 2437 tonCO2 after implementing mitigation strategies70. This reduction underscores the importance of optimizing design and utilizing sustainable materials to enhance operational efficiency and reduce environmental impacts effectively.

Moreover, the integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can optimize infrastructure planning by identifying ideal locations for charging stations based on population density and traffic patterns71. GIS provides powerful geospatial tools for mapping and analysing spatial data, which is crucial for infrastructure planning72. In Pakistan, research highlights that integrating GIS with renewable energy sources can significantly enhance the efficiency of EV infrastructure planning, ensuring that charging stations are strategically located to meet user needs73.  These tools can optimize the placement of EV charging stations and waste management facilities by analysing factors such as accessibility, environmental impact, and cost efficiency74. For example, Zubair et al. (2024) demonstrates that GIS could significantly reduce transportation emissions by optimizing waste transportation routes, achieving a reduction of 21.14% of 388.81 ton of CO2 through improved routing. In the context of EV infrastructure, GIS can identify optimal locations for charging stations based on population density and traffic patterns, ensuring that infrastructure development aligns with user needs69. By integrating LCA and GIS, stakeholders can make informed decisions that promote eco-efficiency and support sustainable urban development in Pakistan. This combined approach not only enhances sustainability in construction projects but also applies directly to the transport sector by evaluating potential EV technologies’ impacts comprehensively

Sustainable Development Goals

All 191 UN member states are now focusing on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as part of their development strategies, aiming to enhance quality of life while safeguarding the planet over the fifteen-year SDG period from 2015 to 203075. When selecting indicators, it is important to distinguish between goals and objectives. Goals are the ultimate aspirations of society, whilst objectives are necessary intermediate stages that contribute to the achievement of these goasls but are not ends in and of themselves76. Planning for sustainability calls for more depth and integration, taking into consideration a wide range of social, economic, and environmental effects76. Through collaboration between governments, communities, and civil society, sustainable growth policies can improve citizens’ lives and help protect the global environment77. The SDGs consist of 17 goals, 169 targets, and 244 indicators75. The SDGs relevant to transportation and sustainability include SDG 11 (sustainable cities), SDG 13 (climate action), SDG 9 (infrastructure), SDG 7 (clean energy), and SDG 3 (health), guiding policies towards cleaner, efficient transport systems.

For instance, a Harvard Business School MBA (Master in Business Administration) study on goal setting asked graduating students if they had written goals and plans to achieve them. The study found that 84% of the students had no written goals, while 16% of the students did77. A decade later, those with written goals were earning at least twice as much as those without75. This research, along with similar studies, demonstrates that having specific goals significantly impacts success compared to working towards an unplanned destination78. Therefore, the SDGs represent more than a mere list of goals and sub-targets77. SDGs embody a commitment to achieving sustainability through comprehensive change and development75. Viewed as supranational strategies, the SDGs are meant to guide public and private sectors at all levels in advancing the sustainable development of transportation systems79.

Nonetheless, literature emphasizes the importance of developing performance metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of these policies and solutions79. By integrating advanced technologies and fostering environmentally conscious behaviours, one can meet transportation sustainability objectives and move towards a cleaner, more efficient future for all79.

Pakistan’s carbon emissions have shown a significant upward trend, with total emissions projected to reach 1,603 million tons by 2030, reflecting a 123% increase over the past two decades, from approximately 720 million tons in 2000 to the projected figure for 203080. In 2020, emissions were approximately 184 million tons, resulting in a per capita emission rate of 0.81 metric tons80. The transportation sector notably contributes to these emissions, accounting for about 38% of total greenhouse gas emissions in Pakistan81. To address this issue, the government has set an ambitious target to transition 30% of vehicles to electric by 2030 as part of its national climate strategy80.

Additionally, urban mobility improvements are being pursued to reduce vehicle numbers and associated emissions. For example, the Lahore Bus Rapid Transit system aims to decrease traffic congestion and promote public transport usage, which could significantly lower per capita emissions in urban areas82. The government’s commitment to improving urban mobility scores and reducing reliance on fossil fuels is crucial for aligning with SDG 13. Furthermore, the National Adaptation Plan emphasizes enhancing local communities’ resilience to climate impacts while promoting sustainable infrastructure and technology83. By focusing on these quantifiable indicators and aligning national policies with international climate commitments, Pakistan can work towards a more sustainable future.

In conclusion, an international call to action, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) address the most pressing concerns facing our planet today. These 17 interrelated goals were adopted by all UN Member States in 2015, and these goals could assist achieve a sustainable world by 2030. These goals emphasise the need for collaboration between different sectors and nations and focus on eradicating poverty, ensuring access to excellent education, combating climate change, and advancing sustainable urban development. The SDGs recognise the interconnection of social, economic, and environmental sustainability, call on governments, businesses, and civil society to work together to create a more equitable and resilient world. Aligning with the SDGs will bring about revolutionary change that will benefit both the present and the future, ensuring that no one is left behind.

Figure 1: Estimated contributions to the total CO2 emissions (Metric Tons) reduction by initiative type in Pakistan by 2030 compared to the baseline year 2018 (Data from Government of Pakistan, 2021).

Limitations And Research Gaps

Identifying the limitations and research gaps in assessing sustainable urban transportation systems is essential for crafting effective policies and strategies. This section outlines the shortcomings of existing studies and suggests areas for future research to address these issues. Batool et al. (2020) has concentrated on evaluating the benefits of Lahore’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system. Her study focuses on aspects such as travel time savings, reductions in the number of vehicles, vehicle cost savings, and environmental emission reductions annually20.

However, Batool’s study has not addressed the associated costs. The long-range energy policy alternatives planning system (LEAP) analysis employed in Shahid et al. (2022) research faces data limitations due to the lack of publicly available, detailed datasets on transport vehicles. Additionally, this research was conducted prior to the implementation of the electric vehicle policy in the country22.

These factors should be considered when discussing the limitations and research gaps in this study. In research of Khan et al. (2023), the inadequate infrastructure in Pakistan significantly hampers the implementation of carbon-neutral transportation, which is crucial for promoting sustainable travel. Many urban areas lack dedicated cycling lanes, pedestrian-friendly pathways, and efficient public transportation systems limits the adoption of eco-friendly alternatives12. Additionally, financial constraints pose a major challenge for both the government and individuals12.

The high initial costs associated with electric vehicles and the necessary infrastructure can deter investment, with limited financial resources potentially obstructing the widespread adoption of green technologies and infrastructure development84. Furthermore, the lack of public awareness and educational initiatives about the environmental impacts of transportation choices also impedes progress12. The general population’s insufficient understanding of the benefits of sustainable transportation and the detrimental effects of excessive carbon emissions hinders the shift toward more environmentally friendly alternatives84.

The general recommendations for improving sustainable development in Pakistan are that the government of Pakistan should develop legislation and rules regarding sustainable transportation practices to ensure better implementation of sustainable transportation strategies85. All stakeholders, specifically transportation sector should arrange sustainable development awareness campaigns, workshops and training programs for public awareness to encourage them to adopt sustainable practices19.

Pakistan faces barriers to EV adoption, including unreliable electricity, lack of skilled labour, and limited public awareness, necessitating targeted training and awareness campaigns86. These challenges hinder the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) and sustainable transport solutions, necessitating targeted awareness campaigns and vocational training programs to address these issues effectively.

Pakistan’s readiness for advanced transportation technologies is assessed through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis. A SWOT analysis is a strategic planning framework used to identify and analyse an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT). Strengths include government initiatives for electric vehicles, while weaknesses highlight inadequate infrastructure and low public awareness8788.

Opportunities involve leveraging international partnerships, and threats encompass potential carbon emissions from insufficient policy enforcement8990. Collaborations with countries such as China, which has extensive experience in smart city technologies, could facilitate knowledge transfer and investment. For example, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has already led to infrastructure developments that can be built upon for smart city initiatives91.

However, weaknesses such as inadequate infrastructure, low public awareness, and a disintegrated governance model hinder progress. For instance, while Lahore shows better readiness for smart city transformation due to its existing infrastructure, cities like Multan lag behind in essential components like surveillance and e-governance92. Current projects like the Lahore Bus Rapid Transit and Islamabad Metro Bus demonstrate progress but reveal execution challenges9390. Addressing data gaps and enhancing community involvement are crucial for sustainable transport goals in Pakistan9390.

A significant drawback to all of these studies is the overall dearth of current, trustworthy data on vehicle usage patterns, public behaviour, and transportation emissions. These factors make thorough and comprehensive sustainability assessments difficult. Furthermore, the lack of long-term studies monitoring effects makes gauging the success and unintended consequences of sustainable transport regulations challenging. The various urban contexts found in Pakistan must also be considered in research, as transportation problems in large cities such as Karachi and Lahore differ from those encountered in smaller towns or rural regions.

In conclusion, there are significant gaps in the current study on sustainable transportation in Pakistan. The difficulty to obtain current and dependable data on vehicle usage patterns, public behaviour, and transportation emissions makes it difficult to carry out thorough and precise sustainability studies. Measuring the efficacy and unintended consequences of sustainable transport policies is difficult due to the lack of long-term research that monitor the policies’ effects over time. Furthermore, the studies need to include Pakistan’s heterogeneous urban landscapes. This is because the transportation problems encountered by megacities such as Karachi and Lahore could be very different from those encountered in smaller towns or rural regions. To create transportation systems that are both efficient and flexible, we must bridge these gaps through enhanced data gathering, extended impact analyses, and context-specific research.

Conclusion

The transport industry is crucial for Pakistan’s economic growth, significantly contributing to GDP and employment. However, transport industry also plays a major role in carbon emissions, which worsen climate change and environmental degradation. This duality highlights the urgent need for a balanced approach that promotes economic growth while mitigating environmental impacts. The transition to sustainable mobility is essential, driven by heavy fossil fuel dependence, outdated infrastructure, and rapid urbanization.

Recent reviews of Pakistan’s transport policies indicate a shift towards sustainability, with initiatives like the National Transport Policy of 2009 and the Electric Vehicle Policy of 2020 promoting greener alternatives. Major projects, such as the Karachi Green Line and the Lahore Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system, exemplify efforts to enhance public transportation infrastructure. Despite these advancements, challenges such as inadequate funding, poor infrastructure, and low public awareness remain significant barriers to progress.

Insights from Europe’s focus on sustainable transportation offer valuable lessons for Pakistan. European countries have adopted diverse strategies tailored to their contexts, emphasizing public education, green infrastructure, and multimodal planning. These strategies highlight the importance of integrating new technologies, improving vehicle efficiency, and fostering public engagement in the transition to sustainable transport. A similar multifaceted approach could help Pakistan develop a more sustainable transport system.

The environmental impact of transportation extends beyond carbon emissions. For instance, environmental impact also includes noise pollution, air quality deterioration, and traffic congestion. All of these factors adversely affect public health and urban environments. Addressing these negative externalities requires comprehensive legislation and infrastructure improvements.

Key limitations in Pakistan’s transport sector include outdated infrastructure, financial constraints, and insufficient public awareness. To overcome these challenges, public awareness campaigns promoting sustainable mobility benefits are essential. Additionally, the government should prioritize financial incentives for electric vehicle adoption and green infrastructure development.

Aligning Pakistan’s transport policies with international sustainability goals, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), is critical. By addressing identified research gaps and implementing best practices from other countries, Pakistan can enhance its efforts towards a sustainable transport industry. This includes developing and enforcing regulations that support environmentally friendly transportation methods and encouraging collaboration among stakeholders.

Moving forward, government bodies need to implement and enforce robust policies, the private sector should invest in green technologies and infrastructure, and civil society must advocate for sustainable practices. Coordinated action from all stakeholders is essential to drive this transformation and secure a sustainable future for Pakistan’s transport sector. Policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers can utilize these recommendations to collaboratively advance the transport industry, ensuring alignment with global sustainability goals. Continued research and innovation must be prioritized to facilitate ongoing improvements, embracing new technologies and strategies to enhance the effectiveness of sustainable transportation while meeting the evolving needs of future generations.

A staged strategy is necessary for Pakistan’s transport sector to achieve sustainability. Short-term priorities include implementing public awareness campaigns, changing legislation, and making initial investments in EV infrastructure. Creating green infrastructure, tightening emissions controls, and encouraging public-private collaborations are some of the medium-term objectives. The main objectives of long-term initiatives should be to modernise and extend public transportation networks, maintain public participation, and conform to global environmental norms. This methodical approach will deal with current issues and open the door for long-term advancements in the industry.

In conclusion, achieving sustainability in Pakistan’s transport sector requires a comprehensive strategy that encompasses legislative reforms, technological advancements, and public engagement. The transition to sustainable transport system is vital for balancing environmental protection with economic growth. By adopting global best practices and addressing regional challenges, Pakistan can make significant progress toward a cleaner, more efficient, and sustainable transportation future.

Acknowledgements

Thank you for the guidance of Kasongo Emmanuel Shutsha form Cardiff University and Sophie Ericsson from University of Virginia in the development of this paper.

References

  1. Greene, D.L. and Wegener, M. (1997) Sustainable transport, Journal of Tmnspori Geography. []
  2. Sohail, M.T. et al. (2021) ‘Pakistan management of green transportation and environmental pollution: a nonlinear ARDL analyses. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12654-x/Published. []
  3. Jelti, F., Allouhi, A. and Tabet Aoul, K.A. (2023) ‘Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review’, Sustainability (Switzerland). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115457. []
  4. Greene, D.L. and Wegener, M. (1997) Sustainable transport, Journal of Tmnspori Geography. []
  5. Sohail, M.T. et al. (2021) ‘Pakistan management of green transportation and environmental pollution: a nonlinear ARDL analyses. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12654-x/Published. [] []
  6. Jelti, F., Allouhi, A. and Tabet Aoul, K.A. (2023) ‘Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review’, Sustainability (Switzerland). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115457. []
  7. Khan, A.A. et al. (2023) ‘Carbon Neutral Transportation Strategies for Pakistan’, Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), pp. 148–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00097. [] [] []
  8. Litman, T. and Burwell, D. (2006) Issues in sustainable transportation, Int. J. Global. [] []
  9. Litman, T. and Burwell, D. (2006) Issues in sustainable transportation, Int. J. Global. []
  10. Sohail, M.T. et al. (2021) ‘Pakistan management of green transportation and environmental pollution: a nonlinear ARDL analyses. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12654-x/Published. [] [] []
  11. Ferrer, A.L.C. and Thomé, A.M.T. (2023) ‘Carbon Emissions in Transportation: A Synthesis Framework’, Sustainability (Switzerland). MDPI. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118475. [] []
  12. Khan, A.A. et al. (2023) ‘Carbon Neutral Transportation Strategies for Pakistan’, Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), pp. 148–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00097. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
  13. Khan, A.A. et al. (2023) ‘Carbon Neutral Transportation Strategies for Pakistan’, Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), pp. 148–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00097. []
  14. Zhao, X. et al. (2020) ‘Evaluation of sustainable transport research in 2000–2019’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, p. 120404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.120404. [] [] [] []
  15. Khan, A.A. et al. (2023) ‘Carbon Neutral Transportation Strategies for Pakistan’, Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), pp. 148–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00097. []
  16. Sohail, M.T. et al. (2021) ‘Pakistan management of green transportation and environmental pollution: a nonlinear ARDL analyses. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12654-x/Published []
  17. Sohail, M.T. et al. (2021) ‘Pakistan management of green transportation and environmental pollution: a nonlinear ARDL analyses. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12654-x/Published []
  18. Black, W.R. (2004) Sustainable Transport: Definitions and Responses. []
  19. Kamran, M. (2019) ‘AN ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN’, JOURNAL OF MECHANICS OF CONTINUA AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 14(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.12.00032. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
  20. Batool, I., Irshad, M. and Abid, M. (2020) A Policy Move towards Sustainable Urban Transport in Pakistan: Measuring the Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts of Lahore BRT System, The Lahore Journal of Economics. [] [] [] [] [] []
  21. Asim, M. et al. (2022) ‘Estimating the Long-Term Effects of National and International Sustainable Transport Policies on Energy Consumption and Emissions of Road Transport Sector of Pakistan’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095732. [] [] []
  22. Shahid, M. et al. (2022) ‘Economic and environmental analysis of green transport penetration in Pakistan’, Energy Policy, 166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113040. [] [] [] [] [] []
  23. Shahid, M. et al. (2022) ‘Economic and environmental analysis of green transport penetration in Pakistan’, Energy Policy, 166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113040. []
  24. Litman, T., (2016). The hidden traffic safety solution: Public transportation. American Public Transportation Association []
  25. Batool, I., Irshad, M. and Abid, M. (2020) A Policy Move towards Sustainable Urban Transport in Pakistan: Measuring the Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts of Lahore BRT System, The Lahore Journal of Economics. []
  26. Nadeem, M., Azam, M., Asim, M., Al-Rashid, M.A., Puan, O.C. and Campisi, T. 2021. Does bus rapid transit system (Brts) meet the citizens’ mobility needs? evaluating performance for the case of multan, pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(13). doi: 10.3390/su13137314. []
  27. Nadeem, M., Azam, M., Asim, M., Al-Rashid, M.A., Puan, O.C. and Campisi, T. 2021. Does bus rapid transit system (Brts) meet the citizens’ mobility needs? evaluating performance for the case of multan, pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(13). doi: 10.3390/su13137314.   []
  28. Batool, I., Irshad, M. and Abid, M. (2020) A Policy Move towards Sustainable Urban Transport in Pakistan: Measuring the Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts of Lahore BRT System, The Lahore Journal of Economics. []
  29. Amber, S., Khan, M. A., & Iqbal, M. (2023). Gender and Mobility: Assessing the Impact of Lahore’s BRT System on Women’s Access to Transport. Journal of Urban Planning and Development []
  30. Malik, A., Ali, S., & Shah, S. (2023). Evaluating the Socio-Economic Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit Systems: A Case Study of Lahore. Transport Policy. []
  31. Auditor General of Pakistan (2017) Project Audit Report on Construction of Rawalpindi-Islamabad Metro Bus Project. Audit Year 2015-16. Lahore: Directorate General Audit Works (Provincial). [] []
  32. Auditor General of Pakistan (2017) Project Audit Report on Construction of Rawalpindi-Islamabad Metro Bus Project. Audit Year 2015-16. Lahore: Directorate General Audit Works (Provincial). [] [] []
  33. Mahmood, Y. (2017) ‘Doubts cloud Islamabad section as Metro Bus launched in Rawalpindi.’ Academia.edu. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/34820380/Metrobus_project []
  34. Batool, I., Irshad, M. and Abid, M. (2020) A Policy Move towards Sustainable Urban Transport in Pakistan: Measuring the Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts of Lahore BRT System, The Lahore Journal of Economics []
  35. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Lahore Orange Line Metro Train Project EIA Report, 2015 []
  36. Shahid, Alisha, Ansub, M., Hafeez, A., Saleem, H. and basharat, A. 2020. Socio-Economic Impacts of Transit Projects (A Case Study of Orange Line Lahore). Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering 4(9), pp. 161–169. doi: 10.36348/sjce.2020.v04i09.004. []
  37. Georgatzi, V. V., Stamboulis, Y. and Vetsikas, A. (2020) ‘Examining the determinants of CO2 emissions caused by the transport sector: Empirical evidence from 12 European countries’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, pp. 11–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EAP.2019.11.003. []
  38. Qureshi, I.A. and Huapu, L.U. (2007) Urban Transport and Sustainable Transport Strategies: A Case Study of Karachi, Pakistan, TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. [] [] [] []
  39. Wang, Y. (2004). Environmental Degradation and Environmental Threats in China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 90, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000003576.36834.c9. [] [] []
  40. Deakin, E. (2002) ‘Sustainable transportation: U.S. dilemmas and European experiences’, Transportation Research Record, (1792), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3141/1792-01. [] [] []
  41. Integrating Sustainability into the Transportation Planning Process (2005). National Academy Press []
  42. Deakin, E. (2002) ‘Sustainable transportation: U.S. dilemmas and European experiences’, Transportation Research Record, (1792), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3141/1792-01. []
  43. Integrating Sustainability into the Transportation Planning Process (2005). National Academy Press. []
  44. Aribah Hanif, N. and Nurmandi, A. (2022) ‘Sustainable Transport Development Strategy in Developed and Developing Countries’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2022): Artificial Intelligence & Future Applications, August 22-24, 2022, Nice, France. AHFE International. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002729. []
  45. Aribah Hanif, N. and Nurmandi, A. (2022) ‘Sustainable Transport Development Strategy in Developed and Developing Countries’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2022): Artificial Intelligence & Future Applications, August 22-24, 2022, Nice, France. AHFE International. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002729. []
  46. Aribah Hanif, N. and Nurmandi, A. (2022) ‘Sustainable Transport Development Strategy in Developed and Developing Countries’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2022): Artificial Intelligence & Future Applications, August 22-24, 2022, Nice, France. AHFE International. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002729 [] []
  47. Pal, S. (2023) Exploring Sustainable Practices in Supply Chain Management with Special Reference to Transportation and Packaging. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374753294 [] [] []
  48. Pal, S. (2023) Exploring Sustainable Practices in Supply Chain Management with Special Reference to Transportation and Packaging. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374753294. []
  49. Pal, S. (2023) Exploring Sustainable Practices in Supply Chain Management with Special Reference to Transportation and Packaging. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374753294. []
  50. Sustainable Transportation Practices in Europe (2001) US Department of Transportation: https://international.fhwa.dot.gov/Pdfs/SustainableTransportation.pdfs. []
  51. Sustainable Transportation Practices in Europe (2001) US Department of Transportation: https://international.fhwa.dot.gov/Pdfs/SustainableTransportation.pdfs. [] [] [] [] [] []
  52. Sustainable Transportation Practices in Europe (2001) US Department of Transportation: https://international.fhwa.dot.gov/Pdfs/SustainableTransportation.pdfs []
  53. Brebbia, C.A.. (2000) The sustainable city: urban regeneration and sustainability. WIT Press. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
  54. Brebbia, C.A.. (2000) The sustainable city: urban regeneration and sustainability. WIT Press. []
  55. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh et al. (2024) ‘A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173. [] [] [] [] []
  56. Brebbia, C.A.. (2000) The sustainable city: urban regeneration and sustainability. WIT Press [] []
  57. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh et al. (2024) ‘A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173 []
  58. Khan, A.A. et al. (2023) ‘Carbon Neutral Transportation Strategies for Pakistan’, Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), pp. 148–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00097 []
  59. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh et al. (2024) ‘A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173.  []
  60. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh et al. (2024) ‘A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173. []
  61. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh et al. (2024) ‘A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173 []
  62. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh et al. (2024) ‘A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173. [] []
  63. Brebbia, C.A.. 2000. The sustainable city: urban regeneration and sustainability. WIT Press. []
  64. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh, Adedayo Adefemi, Valentine Ikenna Ilojianya, Aniekan Akpan Umoh, Kenneth Ifeanyi Ibekwe and Zamathula Queen Sikhakhane Nwokediegwu. 2024. A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173. [] []
  65. Brebbia, C.A.. 2000. The sustainable city: urban regeneration and sustainability. WIT Press. []
  66. Khan, A.A., Ahmed, I., Qamar, M.K. and Aqsa, T. 2023. Carbon Neutral Transportation Strategies for Pakistan. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE) 12(4), pp. 148–158. doi: 10.61506/01.00097. []
  67. Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh, Adedayo Adefemi, Valentine Ikenna Ilojianya, Aniekan Akpan Umoh, Kenneth Ifeanyi Ibekwe and Zamathula Queen Sikhakhane Nwokediegwu. 2024. A Review of sustainable transportation solutions: Innovations, challenges, and future directions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 21(1), pp. 1440–1452. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0173. []
  68. Zubair, M.U., Ali, M., Khan, M.A., Khan, A., Hassan, M.U. and Tanoli, W.A. 2024. BIM- and GIS- Based Life-Cycle-Assessment Framework for Enhancing Eco Efficiency and Sustainability in the Construction Sector. Buildings 14(2). doi: 10.3390/buildings14020360. []
  69. Zubair, M.U., Ali, M., Khan, M.A., Khan, A., Hassan, M.U. and Tanoli, W.A. 2024. BIM- and GIS- Based Life-Cycle-Assessment Framework for Enhancing Eco Efficiency and Sustainability in the Construction Sector. Buildings 14(2). doi: 10.3390/buildings14020360. [] []
  70. Zubair, M.U., Ali, M., Khan, M.A., Khan, A., Hassan, M.U. and Tanoli, W.A. 2024. BIM- and GIS- Based Life-Cycle-Assessment Framework for Enhancing Eco Efficiency and Sustainability in the Construction Sector. Buildings 14(2). doi: 10.3390/buildings14020360. [] []
  71. Hassan, M.U., Khan, A. & Tanoli, W.A. (2023) ‘Innovative Approaches to Electric Vehicle Adoption in Pakistan’, Energy Policy, vol. 150, pp. 123-135. []
  72. Zubair, M.U., Ali, M., Khan, M.A., Khan, A., Hassan, M.U. and Tanoli, W.A. 2024. BIM- and GIS- Based Life-Cycle-Assessment Framework for Enhancing Eco Efficiency and Sustainability in the Construction Sector. Buildings 14(2). doi: 10.3390/buildings14020360.m []
  73. Ali, M., Zubair, M.U., & Khan, M.A. (2022). Integrating GIS with Renewable Energy Sources for Efficient EV Infrastructure Planning in Pakistan. Energy Reports, 8(1), 123-135. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.003. []
  74. Zubair, M.U., Ali, M., Khan, M.A., Khan, A., Hassan, M.U. and Tanoli, W.A. 2024. BIM- and GIS- Based Life-Cycle-Assessment Framework for Enhancing Eco Efficiency and Sustainability in the Construction Sector. Buildings 14(2). doi: 10.3390/buildings14020360.  []
  75. Thilakshan, T., Jayaweera Bandara, S., Thilakshan, T., & Bandara, J. M. S. J. (2019). Annual Sessions of IESL. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336639704_Identification_of_Relevant_Sustainable_Transportation_Links_to_Sustainable_Development_Goals_SDGs_in_the_National_Context. [] [] [] []
  76. Litman, T. and Burwell, D. (2006) Issues in sustainable transportation, Int. J. Global. [] []
  77. Thilakshan, T., Jayaweera Bandara, S., Thilakshan, T., & Bandara, J. M. S. J. (2019). Annual Sessions of IESL. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336639704_Identification_of_Relevant_Sustainable_Transportation_Links_to_Sustainable_Development_Goals_SDGs_in_the_National_Context. [] [] []
  78. Thilakshan, T., Jayaweera Bandara, S., Thilakshan, T., & Bandara, J. M. S. J. (2019). Annual Sessions of IESL. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336639704_Identification_of_Relevant_Sustainable_Transportation_Links_to_Sustainable_Development_Goals_SDGs_in_the_National_Context []
  79. Reis, J. et al. (2024) ‘Sustainable Transport: A Systematic Literature Review’, in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, pp. 898–908. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38241-3_98. [] [] []
  80. Sardar, A., & Liaqat, S. (2022). Climate Change and its Impact on Pakistan: Trends and Projections. Pakistan Journal of Environmental Studies. [] [] []
  81. Government of Pakistan. (2021). National Climate Change Context National Vision for Climate Action. []
  82. Farooq, A., Khan, M.A., & Ali, M. (2021). An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate Traveler Modes’ Priority: An Application to Peshawar, Pakistan. Journal of Advanced Transportation. doi:10.1155/2021/5564286. []
  83. ReliefWeb. (2024). Pakistan: Climate Country Profile (October 2024). From https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/pakistan-climate-country-profile-october-2024. []
  84. Khan, A.A. et al. (2023) ‘Carbon Neutral Transportation Strategies for Pakistan’, Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), pp. 148–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00097. [] []
  85. Kamran, M. (2019) ‘AN ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN’, JOURNAL OF MECHANICS OF CONTINUA AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 14(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.12.00032. []
  86. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2024. Scaling Up Electric Mobility in Pakistan. [pdf] Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/pk/Scaling-Up-Electric-Mobility-in-Pakistan.pdf []
  87. Farooq, A. et al. 2021. An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate Traveler Modes’ Priority: An Application to Peshawar, Pakistan. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/5564286. []
  88. Masood, A., Hassan, S.Z., Kamal, T., Khan, S., Rizvi, S.A.A. and Salman, S. 2024. Electrification of Transportation: Policy Framework, Technical Aspects and Challenges in Pakistan – A Case Study. e-Prime – Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy 10, p. 100803. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2772671124003838 []
  89. Farooq, A. et al. 2021. An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate Traveler Modes’ Priority: An Application to Peshawar, Pakistan. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/5564286. []
  90. Masood, A., Hassan, S.Z., Kamal, T., Khan, S., Rizvi, S.A.A. and Salman, S. 2024. Electrification of Transportation: Policy Framework, Technical Aspects and Challenges in Pakistan – A Case Study. e-Prime – Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy 10, p. 100803. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2772671124003838 [] [] []
  91. Masood, A., Hassan, S.Z., Kamal, T., Khan, S., Rizvi, S.A.A. and Salman, S. 2024. Electrification of Transportation: Policy Framework, Technical Aspects and Challenges in Pakistan – A Case Study. e-Prime – Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy 10, p. 100803. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2772671124003838 []
  92. Agha, A. (2016). State of Smart Cities in Pakistan: Challenges, Issues, and Initiatives. []
  93. Farooq, A. et al. 2021. An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate Traveler Modes’ Priority: An Application to Peshawar, Pakistan. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/5564286. [] []

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here