Metal-Organic frameworks (MOFs) for the Next Generation of Water Filtration

Abstract

The growing global water crisis demands the development of innovative and effective water filtration methods. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising candidates due to their unique properties. This review explores the potential of UiO-66 and HKUST-1, two particularly advantageous MOFs, to revolutionize effective water filtration. The focus is on synthesis methods and strategies for structural modification employed to enhance the efficiency of these MOFs for capturing contaminants and purifying water. The highlighted features of UiO-66 and HKUST-1, including their flexible architectures and high-yield synthesis techniques, present significant opportunities for achieving effective water filtration on a large scale.

Introduction

The world is facing a water crisis that is growing daily, with pollution creating several problems for the global population. Water pollution, caused by human activities such as industrialization, urbanization, oil spills, toxic waste from sewage pipes, as well as natural processes like volcanic eruptions, floods, and aid rains, which have severe consequences for both human health and the ecosystem.¹ Millions of people worldwide, most of whom belong to the rural areas of developing countries, are affected by water pollution. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 2.2 billion people do not have access to clean drinking water, and an estimated 1.8 billion people consume contaminated water, leading to the spread of multiple waterborne diseases, including cholera, typhoid, anemia, and diarrhea. Microbiologically contaminated drinking water can transmit diseases such as diarrhea, cholera, dysentery, typhoid, and polio and is estimated to cause 485,000 diarrhea-related deaths each year.²  Lead is a neurotoxin, and reports have shown that exposure to lead-contaminated water can affect children’s development and cause damage to the brain, slowed growth, and behavioral issues³. 

Currently, there is a continuously increasing concern worldwide regarding the development of water filtration technologies. The world of water filtration relies on established technologies like activated carbon filters, reverse osmosis systems, and ion exchange resins. While they may be effective in improving water quality, these methods have some limitations like, high energy consumption, generation of waste byproducts, and limited effectiveness against certain contaminants. This review aims to explore the optimization and utilization of MOFs as next-generation water filters to enhance water purification processes and address the emerging challenges in water treatment. By investigating MOF design, synthesis techniques, and functional modifications, this study seeks to unlock the full potential of MOFs for efficiently removing contaminants from water sources.⁴

Criteria for MOF Selection

Finding the ideal MOF for water purification depends on several key factors such as stability, selectivity for targeted contaminants, ample surface area for adsorption, and appropriate pore size for capturing pollutants are all crucial considerations. Additionally, considerations like the cost of synthesis, and the MOF’s environmental footprint, become paramount. Reproducible and consistent synthesis methods are essential to scale up MOF production for real-world applications.

The selection of appropriate MOFs requires the development of reliable and reproducible synthesis methods. To do this, researchers must prioritize the standardization of synthesis protocols. This means establishing well-defined and replicable procedures that guarantee consistent outcomes. Furthermore, employing high-purity reagents reduces the introduction of impurities that could potentially change the final MOF structure and its performance. Finally, complete control over reaction conditions, factors like temperature, reaction time, and solvent ratios, is very important. These parameters significantly impact the formation and characteristics of the resulting MOF.

MOFs are a new class of materials that have gained significant academic attention over the last two decades. MOFs are formed by linking inorganic and organic units through strong bonds. The flexibility with which the constituents’ geometry, size, and functionality can be varied has led to more than 20,000 different MOFs being reported and studied in the past decade. To date, MOFs with permanent porosity are more extensive in their variety and multiplicity than any other class of porous material. These aspects have made MOFs ideal candidates for water filtration, and the storage of fuels (hydrogen and methane), to mention a few⁵.

UiO-66 and HKUST-1 have emerged as promising candidates for many potential applications including water filtration. They are two of the most studied MOFs for water filtration and there is a lot of material available on their applications and properties. Moreover, they have been shown to be effective in removing a variety of contaminants from water sources, such as heavy metals, organic pollutants, and bacteria. In addition, they are both relatively easy and inexpensive to manufacture and synthesize, making them an excellent choice for future water purification. This is a particularly important aspect to consider, as clean water is a critical need almost everywhere in the world, and the cost of access stands as a barrier between people and clean water. Furthermore, they have been shown to be both stable and durable, which means that they can be used for long-term water purification applications.

Metal-Organic Frameworks

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising candidates with the potential to reshape water filtering methods and revolutionize the field of water treatment. MOFs, which are known for their exceptional porosity and intricate composition, are composed of metal ions and organic connectors. Their distinguishing characteristics, such as large surface areas and adjustable pore sizes, hold significant promise for addressing the complex issues that arise during water purification⁶.

MOFs are composed of interconnected metal ions or clusters held together by organic bonds. Organic bonds are chemical bonds that are held together with organic molecules. They are formed by the sharing of electrons between carbon atoms and other atoms such as hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. The metal ions form the framework, whereas the organic bindings contribute to the porous nature of the material. MOFs can be meticulously customized by adjusting factors such as the metal ion type, organic binding, and synthetic conditions. MOFs are notable for their inherent tunability, which allows the modification of their properties through structural changes. The dimensions of organic ligands, for example, can be changed to alter the pore size of an MOF. This adaptability gives MOFs versatility, allowing their design to effectively target specific contaminants⁷.

Two leading researchers in the field of MOFs are Cavka et al. and Loera-Serna et al. Cavka et al. first synthesized UiO-66 MOF in 2008, and Loera-Serna et al. first synthesized HKUST-1 MOF in 1999. Both MOFs have been used in a variety of applications including gas storage, catalysis, and sensing. UiO-66 is a metal-organic framework with a high surface area and good thermal stability. HKUST-1 is a metal-organic framework with a large pore size and high hydrothermal stability.

MOFs have also been explored for potential use in water purification. They can be used to remove a wide range of pollutants, including heavy metals, organic pollutants, and bacteria, from water. The porous nature of MOFs allows them to trap pollutants within their pores. The specific pollutants that can be removed by MOFs depend on their type and properties.

MOFs are still under development for water purification, but they have the potential to be promising new technologies. They are relatively inexpensive to produce and can be easily regenerated and reused. In addition, they are not toxic to humans or the environment.

Over the last half-century, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have garnered significant attention. Their intriguing characteristic is their porosity, which enables diffusion of guest molecules throughout the bulk structure. The dimensions and contours of these pores determine the shape and size selectivity of the incorporated guests. MOFs are created by anchoring metal-containing units with organic linkers via coordination, resulting in open frameworks that exhibit exceptional features, such as stable frameworks, large surface areas, and pore volumes. Porosity is a result of the long organic linkers that confer ample storage space and numerous adsorption sites within the MOFs. They also possess the ability to systematically vary and functionalize their pore structure.⁸

Although MOFs offer great promise for water purification, continued research is necessary to enhance their efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In addition to these benefits, MOFs offer additional advantages for water purification. Their nontoxic and biodegradable nature makes them a sustainable option for water treatment. Additionally, their relatively straightforward synthesis makes them an economically viable solution for the water purification challenges faced by developing nations.

UiO-66 MOF

UiO-66 has attracted significant attention from the scientific community owing to its distinctive properties and potential applications⁹. These compounds belong to the category of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are complex materials that combine metal ions or clusters with organic ligands to create a wide range of structures with various properties. The synthesis journey of UiO-66 is a complicated process that unfolds with precision and careful orchestration¹⁰. It includes the mixing of two key constituents: zirconium tetrachloride (ZrCl4) and terephthalic acid (H2BDC). This reaction occurs within a solvent, such as dimethylformamide (DMF), which results in the formation of UiO-66. The solution resulting from this mixture is then closed in a specialized autoclave chamber. This sealed vessel serves the location where controlled reactions can occur. The temperature setting plays a pivotal role in dictating the tempo and progression of chemical transformations that give rise to UiO-66 crystals⁹.

As the sealed oven heats up, the mixed solution undergoes symphony reactions. In this molecular composition, zirconium tetrachloride and terephthalic acid molecules engage in a synchronized dance of rearrangements and bonds. The culmination of these reactions yields with a crystalline structure of UiO-66. The duration of heating and specific temperature range had a substantial influence on the size, shape, and overall quality of the resulting UiO-66 crystals⁹. 

The genuine nature of UiO-66 was revealed using advanced characterization techniques that shed light on its concealed complexities. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) is one such technique. PXRD is a nondestructive technique that uses X-rays to determine the crystal structure of a material. The atoms in the material scatter X-rays, and the resulting pattern is used to calculate the spacing between the atoms. Researchers meticulously decode this pattern to reveal the precise arrangement of atoms within the crystal structure. PXRD provides insight into the symmetry, lattice constants, and overall crystal quality of a material⁹. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is another technique for this purpose. SEM is a microscopy technique that scans the surface of a material using an electron beam. This can be used to visualize the shape of a material, including its size, shape, and surface features¹¹.

Beyond the synthesis process, scientists embarked on a journey to tailor UiO-66 to specific needs. This involves adjusting variables, such as initial concentrations, reaction durations, and temperature profiles. This practice mimics the skill of creating, in which skilled workers control the components to achieve the desired visual appeal. Within the UiO-66 domain, these modifications resulted in the formation of substances with distinct properties. These tailored attributes can encompass enhanced catalytic properties, superior stability, and customized porosity engineered for specific applications⁹. 

Visualization of UiO-66 as a complex network of interconnected nodes and ligands provides insight into its internal composition. Metal clusters, which are frequently composed of zirconium oxide, serve as central nodes. These nodes are connected by organic ligands, such as terephthalic acid, creating a framework that defines UiO-66’s architecture. The arrangement of these nodes leads to the formation of distinctive compartments or chambers in complex structure¹¹.

Researchers have explored post-synthetic modifications to enhance UiO-66 with additional functionalities. The adaptability of the material is enhanced through the intentional integration of functional groups or guest molecules, reminiscent of versatile tools. The modified variants of UiO-66 act as foundations for a wide range of applications, including gas storage, water purification, and controlled drug delivery, similar to an object gaining new capabilities through strategic enhancements⁹. 

The trajectory of UiO-66’s research narrative propels forward with thirst for discovery. As researchers delve into molecular tapestry, they unveil hidden dimensions and unearth novel prospects. This ongoing journey captures the essence of a captivating story, in which each revelation pens a new chapter in the story of UiO-66’s potential, spanning various scientific domains and practical applications⁹.

Experimental studies have shown that UiO-66 can effectively remove contaminants such as lead, arsenic, chromium, organic dyes, and bacterial pathogens from water. However, challenges remain in optimizing these MOFs for large-scale applications, particularly in dealing with variable water compositions and the presence of multiple contaminants.

HKUST-1 MOF

Exploring the area of sophisticated materials, our attention is now directed towards HKUST-1, a well-known metal-organic framework (MOF) that was first introduced in 1999. Its exceptional qualities and complex structural features have made it a subject of intensive research in the scientific community. HKUST-1 is a well-studied MOF with exceptional properties, including a complex structure and high porosity¹³. 

HKUST-1 is an intricate construct characterized by Cu2 paddlewheel clusters and BTC3− ligands, meticulously orchestrated to create a crystalline lattice of noteworthy complexity. This lattice conforms to a cF crystal structure, bearing the signature of space group Fm3̅m. The unique structure of HKUST-1 is its high porosity and other properties¹⁴.

An interesting aspect of HKUST-1 is its inherent absorption, much like a multifaceted sponge brimming with interconnected cavities. Notably, these holes have dual dimensions, reflecting the unique design of the material. By strategically removing water molecules, unsaturated metal sites (OMS) were revealed, where Cu (II) ions remained uncoordinated in the absence of organic ligands. This strategic maneuver highlights HKUST-1’s inclination towards adsorption applications. The high porosity of HKUST-1 makes it a promising material for a variety of applications including water purification and catalysis⁷. 

The multifaceted attributes of HKUST-1 resonate across a spectrum of applications, which is marked by its substantial surface area and simple OMS accessibility. From water purification to tailored catalytic applications, HKUST-1’s versatility is a testament to its structural sophistication. The synthesis of HKUST-1 is relatively straightforward and can be performed using a variety of method⁷.

HKUST-1 was synthesized through a solvothermal procedure, coordinating the concordant interplay of the pivotal reactants. HKUST-1 was synthesized through the dissolution of H2BTC and NaHCO3 in deionized water, followed by the gradual addition of Cu (NO3)2 in ethanol. The step-by-step inclusion of a solution containing copper (II) nitrate trihydrate (Cu (NO3)2) in ethanol culminated in the synthesis of HKUST-1. The resulting substance was separated by centrifugation and dried to yield a significant yield of 89.6% based on the dry weight. The synthesis of HKUST-1 is relatively straightforward and can be performed using a variety of methods¹³.

Various techniques have been utilized to verify the existence of HKUST-1, including powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) being one of them. PXRD is a nondestructive approach that leverages X-rays to reveal the crystal structure of a material. In the case of HKUST-1, PXRD played a pivotal role in examining the potential effects of lead contamination and microorganisms on the crystal structure. Consider the following scenario: if the PXRD pattern deviates from expectations and shows structural distortions, it could indicate the possible presence of lead or microorganisms. PXRD is a powerful tool that can be used to identify HKUST-1 and study its structure and properties¹³.

Another technique that can be utilized to examine the surface of a material is Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), which utilizes electron beams to scrutinize a material’s surface in detail. In the case of HKUST-1, SEM provided us with an opportunity to investigate its shape, size, and most importantly, its pores. This becomes particularly significant when investigating how HKUST-1’s surface interacts with lead contamination or microorganisms. If SEM images reveal that pores are blocked by lead or microorganisms, HKUST-1 may not effectively handle these unwanted intruders. PXRD and SEM are powerful tools that can be employed to describe HKUST-1 and study its properties¹³.

To confirm the presence of HKUST-1, a robust methodology encompassed the correlation of experimental patterns with known HKUST-1 signatures through PXRD. Additionally, microscopic techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), enable the examination of structural congruence, solidifying the identification process. Furthermore, the use of gas adsorption studies serves as an additional validation, affording quantification of surface area and porosity. The combination of these techniques can provide a comprehensive characterization of HKUST-1 and help ensure its authenticity¹³.

Highlighting the fundamental makeup of HKUST-1, clusters of Cu2 paddlewheels seamlessly blend with BTC3− ligands to produce a highly intricate framework¹⁴. These clusters, consisting of copper ions, interlock within a hexagonal grid and combine with BTC3− ligands. The combination of these structural patterns creates a two-level pore structure, distinguished by varying nanoscale measurements. The unique structure of HKUST-1 is responsible for its many properties¹³.

Examination of the constituent components revealed clusters of Cu2 paddlewheels composed of copper ions and oxygen atoms arranged in unique formations. The Cu2+ ions assumed a square planar configuration, whereas the oxygen atoms exhibited a tetrahedral geometry. The BTC3− ligands, which are molecules comprising benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid, intricately coordinate with Cu2+ ions, forming robust bonds that hold the structure together. The combination of these elements produces highly stable and versatile material¹⁴.

The inclusion of Cu2 paddlewheel clusters and BTC3− ligands intensified the structural framework of HKUST-1, resulting in a harmonious blend of porosity and structural complexity. The adaptable nature of this configuration makes structural modifications possible through synthetic adjustments and post-synthetic interventions. These efforts have expanded the applicability of HKUST-1, making it a fascinating contender in multiple scientific and technological fields¹³.

Experimental studies have shown that HKUST-1 can effectively remove contaminants such as lead, arsenic, chromium, organic dyes, and bacterial pathogens from water. However, challenges remain in optimizing these MOFs for large-scale applications, particularly in dealing with variable water compositions and the presence of multiple contaminants. HKUST-1 is a versatile and promising material that has a wide range of potential applications. Its unique structure and properties make it a valuable tool for research and development in various field¹³.

Property	UIO-66	HKUST-1
Metal Ion	Zr	Cu
Linker	Terephthalic Acid (tetratopic organic linkers)	Benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate
Stability	High	Moderate
Porosity	Moderate	High
Surface Area	High	Very high
Contaminant Removal	Metals, Organics, Bacteria	Metals, Organics, Bacteria
Synthesis Cost	Moderate	Low
Environmental Impact	Low	Moderate

Comparative Analysis

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) provide multiple advantages over current water filtration techniques, presenting a potentially transformative solution to address the challenges of water contamination. Unlike activated carbon filtration, which may inadvertently eliminate beneficial elements along with contaminants, MOFs are precisely designed to target specific pollutants, leaving essential minerals untouched. Compared to reverse osmosis, a powerful technique that requires substantial energy and generates waste in the form of brine, MOFs have the potential to be more energy-efficient owing to their porous structures and flexible properties.

When compared to ion exchange resins, which have a limited capacity and require chemical regeneration, MOFs stand out because they offer selective ion removal combined with the potential for environmentally friendly regeneration. In contrast to chemical coagulation, which introduces more chemicals into water treatment, MOFs have the potential to remove pollutants without adding more chemicals to water. Furthermore, while UV disinfection effectively eliminates pathogens, it is unable to remove other contaminants, a gap that MOFs can fill by capturing harmful substances while disinfecting water simultaneously.

The key difference lies in MOFs’ tailored selectivity – they can be engineered to specifically capture certain pollutants while preserving the essential components of water. MOFs’ remarkable efficiency, driven by their large surface areas and porous structures, enables them to effectively eliminate a wide range of impurities. However, not all aspects are perfect.

Compared to traditional filtration methods, MOFs have the potential to offer more sustainable and environmentally friendly solutions. Traditional methods, such as activated carbon filtration, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange, often involve high energy consumption and generate significant waste byproducts. Activated carbon filtration, for example, requires frequent replacement and disposal of spent carbon, contributing to solid waste. Reverse osmosis, while highly effective, consumes substantial amounts of energy and produces brine as a byproduct, which needs careful disposal. Ion exchange resins also require periodic regeneration with chemicals, generating waste streams that can be harmful to the environment.

MOFs, on the other hand, can be engineered for specific selectivity and efficiency, potentially reducing the overall environmental footprint of water purification processes. Their high surface area and tunable pore sizes allow for targeted removal of contaminants, potentially enhancing the efficiency and reducing the energy requirements of the purification process. Additionally, the ability to regenerate MOFs for repeated use further enhances their sustainability compared to traditional single-use filters.

However, the long-term ecological effects of MOFs, including the potential release of metal ions, must be thoroughly evaluated. Comprehensive environmental impact assessments are needed to determine the sustainability of MOFs in water purification applications. These assessments should consider not only the immediate effectiveness of MOFs in removing contaminants but also their long-term stability, potential for leaching, and overall lifecycle impact. For instance, the environmental impact of the synthesis process, including the use of solvents and reagents, must be assessed to ensure that the benefits of MOFs outweigh their production footprint.

Developing protocols for the safe disposal or recycling of spent MOFs will be crucial to mitigating any adverse environmental impacts. Research into environmentally friendly methods for MOF degradation or recycling is essential. This includes exploring biological or chemical pathways for breaking down MOFs into non-toxic components that can be safely reintroduced into the environment or reused in other industrial processes.

Moreover, life cycle assessments (LCA) can provide a holistic view of the environmental impacts of MOFs from production to disposal. LCAs can help identify critical areas where improvements can be made, such as reducing the energy intensity of synthesis or finding alternative, less harmful reagents. Comparing the LCA results of MOFs with traditional filtration technologies can highlight the potential environmental benefits and trade-offs, guiding future research and development efforts.

Another key consideration is the potential for secondary environmental benefits. For example, the use of MOFs in water treatment can help reduce the prevalence of waterborne diseases, thereby decreasing healthcare burdens and associated environmental impacts. Similarly, more efficient water purification can lead to better water resource management, reducing the strain on natural water bodies and ecosystems.

In conclusion, while MOFs hold significant promise for providing sustainable water purification solutions, their long-term ecological impacts need to be thoroughly investigated. Comprehensive environmental impact assessments, safe disposal protocols, and life cycle assessments are essential for ensuring that the adoption of MOF technology leads to genuine environmental benefits. By addressing these challenges, MOFs can contribute to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to water purification, aligning with global efforts to protect and preserve our natural resources.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

While UiO-66 and HKUST-1 demonstrate promising potential for water purification, large-scale implementation necessitates addressing environmental impact considerations throughout the MOF lifecycle. Although their synthesis methods utilize common reagents and established procedures, potential environmental hazards exist. The solvents and reagents used in synthesis can pose risks if not managed properly. Furthermore, the large-scale application of MOFs in water filtration systems raises concerns about the potential release of metal ions, particularly for MOFs like HKUST-1 containing copper ions that could leach into treated water.

To mitigate these concerns, ongoing research is underway to develop more sustainable synthesis methods. Green chemistry approaches that minimize environmental impact are being explored, such as replacing hazardous solvents with water or ethanol. These approaches not only improve sustainability but also have the potential to further reduce costs.

Beyond synthesis, post-treatment modifications can enhance MOF stability and environmental impact. Coating MOFs with protective layers or incorporating them into composite materials can potentially prevent metal ion release. Research in MOF recycling and regeneration after use in filtration systems is another crucial area. Efficient regeneration methods would allow MOFs to be reused multiple times without significant performance loss, thereby minimizing waste generation and reducing production requirements.

Challenges

Scaling up the use of MOFs presents significant economic and practical challenges. While MOFs are known for their high efficiency and selectivity, evaluating their production costs and long-term stability is essential. The synthesis methods for UiO-66 and HKUST-1 are relatively straightforward and cost-effective, using common reagents and simple procedures, which makes them suitable for large-scale production. However, the production process must be further optimized to reduce costs and ensure consistent quality at an industrial scale. This involves not only refining the synthesis procedures to enhance yield and reduce waste but also developing scalable manufacturing techniques that can maintain the structural integrity and performance of MOFs over extended periods.

Additionally, detailed cost-benefit analyses and pilot-scale studies are necessary to determine the practicality of MOF-based water purification systems in real-world settings. These studies should account for the initial investment in production facilities, operational costs, maintenance, and potential savings from improved water quality and reduced health impacts. It’s crucial to compare these factors with existing water purification technologies to highlight the economic advantages or identify areas needing improvement.

Another practical challenge lies in the deployment and integration of MOF systems into existing water infrastructure. This requires designing MOF filters that can be easily incorporated into current filtration units or developing standalone units that are user-friendly and cost-effective. The long-term stability and durability of MOFs under various environmental conditions must also be assessed to ensure they can withstand real-world operational stresses without significant degradation.

Furthermore, the regeneration and reuse of MOFs are critical for their economic viability. Efficient methods for regenerating MOFs after they have adsorbed contaminants can significantly reduce operational costs and environmental impact. Research into low-energy, effective regeneration techniques is ongoing and essential for the sustainable use of MOFs in large-scale applications.

Addressing these economic feasibility issues will be critical in transitioning MOF technology from the lab to widespread practical use. Policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers must collaborate to create a supportive framework that includes funding for pilot projects, incentives for sustainable technology adoption, and regulations that ensure the safe and effective use of MOFs in water purification. By overcoming these challenges, MOFs could provide a revolutionary solution to the global water crisis, offering clean, safe drinking water more efficiently and sustainably than ever before.

Future Trends

Future research should focus on creating more sustainable and cost-effective synthesis processes, improving the stability and selectivity of MOFs, and investigating their application in conjunction with other filtration technologies. Current synthesis methods frequently use hazardous solvents and reagents, which raises production costs and poses environmental dangers. Green chemistry advancements, such as employing water or ethanol as solvents, as well as alternative synthesis methodologies such as microwave-assisted synthesis and mechanochemical approaches, have the potential to minimize MOF production’s environmental footprint and costs.

Improving the stability and selectivity of MOFs is critical for their long-term use in water purification. Researchers are investigating post-synthetic modifications, such as protective coatings and composite materials, to improve stability, as well as functionalizing MOFs with specific chemical groups to increase selectivity for selected pollutants.

Combining MOFs with conventional filtration technologies, such as activated carbon filtration, reverse osmosis, or ion exchange, could result in hybrid systems that capitalize on the characteristics of each approach, increasing overall efficiency and lowering costs. Advances in nanotechnology may improve the performance of MOFs by allowing for certain engineering of their properties and the integration of nanoparticles to boost conductivity, strength, and adsorption capacity.

Interdisciplinary cooperation and financing for pilot projects are required to move MOF technology from the lab to real-world applications. By focusing on these areas, researchers can develop sophisticated MOF-based solutions to the global water crisis that are both effective and sustainable.

Conclusion

The synthesis methods for UiO-66 and HKUST-1 are relatively straightforward and cost-effective, involving common reagents and simple procedures. These attributes make them viable candidates for large-scale production. UiO-66, typically synthesized using zirconium tetrachloride and terephthalic acid in a solvent like dimethylformamide (DMF), and HKUST-1, often produced using copper nitrate and benzene tricarboxylic acid, have well-documented procedures that yield high-quality MOFs with consistent properties. These methods are advantageous because they do not require exotic or expensive materials, and the processes can be scaled up with relative ease.

Applying MOFs as an adsorbent material for contaminant removal via water purification, the stability of the applied MOF in water and contaminated water should be considered first. The different structures and topologies of MOFs can affect the stability performance of the materials. Generally, the selected metal ion/cluster should exist of highly charged cations, such as Cr3+, V3+, Fe3+, Al3+, Ti4+and Tb3, to construct MOF frameworks that possess a good to excellent thermal and water stability. based on the reported mechanisms of the framework decomposition of MOFs, the interaction between metal and linker is the next decisive factor for MOFs design. Compared with the above factors, tuning of structural features within the framework, strengthening of the framework and functionalizing frameworks or framework surface, etc., could also be a unique method for the development of water stable MOFs. Up to now, the design and modification for MOFs having excellent water stability are still continuously under investigation since it is important to extend the versatility of MOFs. Metal-organic frameworks could serve as prospective alternative adsorbent materials for water purification due to their outstanding properties such as high surface area, more sites of metal ions or organic linkers to coordinate contaminant compounds, recyclability of adsorbent after saturation, etc. However, Further research is required to determine the scalability and stability of MOF synthesis. Including, the understanding of the interaction and mechanisms between contaminants and MOFs that could guide scientists for new strategies in design or functionalization of MOFs. The need for clean water access, particularly in developing countries, requires the water purification potential of MOFs to be unlocked. In conclusion, the potential of MOFs to revolutionize water purification is profound. With ongoing research and development, these materials hold the promise of playing a pivotal role in expanding access to clean water for people across the globe.

Definitions

• Activated Carbon Filtration: A method for cleaning water that uses activated carbon, a special material with lots of surface area, to trap impurities and contaminants.
• Adsorption: This is the process where tiny particles like atoms or molecules stick to the surface of a material. Imagine a sponge soaking up water, that’s kind of like adsorption.
• Bacteria: These are single-celled organisms, way too small to see without a microscope, that can sometimes make us sick.
• Benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (H2BTC): This is a fancy scientific name for a molecule with three specific groups of atoms attached to it.
• Carboxylate Groups: These are specific groups of atoms that are found in many molecules.
• Catalysis: This is when a substance, called a catalyst, speeds up a chemical reaction without being used up itself. Like adding a pinch of salt to water to make pasta boil faster, the salt is the catalyst.
• Cu2+ Ions: Copper atoms can lose electrons and become positively charged. Cu2+ refers to a copper ion with a double positive charge.
• Deprotonation Agent: A molecule that donates tiny positively charged particles called protons to other molecules.
• Drug Delivery: This is the fancy way of saying how medicine gets to where it needs to go in the body.
• Gas Adsorption: A specific technique scientists use to measure how much empty space (porosity) is in a material. They use gas molecules to fill those spaces and then measure how much gas sticks.
• Heavy Metals: These are metals that are very dense and can be poisonous even in small amounts.
• HKUST-1 (MOF-199): This is a specific type of Metal-Organic Framework, kind of like a designer material made from copper and organic molecules.
• Ion Exchange: A way of cleaning water by swapping out unwanted ions (tiny charged particles) for harmless ones.
• Ligands: These are molecules or ions that bond with metal ions. Imagine puzzle pieces, ligands connect to metal ions to form a bigger structure.
• Metal-Organic Framework (MOF): A special material made by connecting metal ions with organic molecules, like Legos but much smaller! They have a lot of surface area and empty space which makes them useful for things like water purification.
• Organic Pollutants: These are harmful chemical compounds made from carbon that can pollute the environment.
• Porosity: The amount of empty space or holes within a material.
• Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD): A technique that uses X-rays to see how atoms are arranged in a material.
• Regeneration: The process of making a used material useful again, like refilling a water filter.
• Reverse Osmosis (RO): A water purification method that uses a special membrane to remove impurities from water.
• Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): A powerful tool that uses electrons to see the surface of a material in great detail.
• Solvothermal Process: A way of making new materials by heating them up in a special liquid.
• Surface Area: The total amount of surface a material has. Imagine a bumpy object compared to a smooth one, the bumpy one has more surface area.
• Synthesis: The scientific word for creating something new through a chemical reaction.
• Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): An even more powerful microscope than SEM that can see the structure of materials down to the level of atoms.
• UiO-66: Another kind of Metal-Organic Framework, this one is known for being very stable and having a lot of surface area.
• Unsaturated Metal Sites: Metal sites in a MOF that don’t have enough molecules bonded to them yet. These sites can be used to capture specific small molecules.
• Water Purification: The process of removing contaminants from water to make it safe to drink.
• Waterborne Diseases: Illnesses you can get from drinking water that is contaminated with harmful microorganisms.

References

1. J. A. Nathanson, Water Pollution, https://www.britannica.com/science/water-pollution, (2023). [↩]
2. UN, WHO, and UNICEF launch updated estimates for water, sanitation and hygiene,                      https://www.unwater.org/news/who-and-unicef-launch-updated-estimates-water-sanitation-and-hygiene , (2019). [↩]
3. UN, Water for Life Decade, https://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/quality.shtml , (2015). [↩]
4. H. Xiao, Z. Low, D. B. Gore, R. Kumar, M. Asadnia, Z. Zhong. Porous metal–organic framework-based filters: Synthesis methods and applications for environmental remediation, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894721047367, (2022). [↩]
5. A. Dakkak, Water Pollution Worries in Developing World, https://www.ecomena.org/water-pollution/, (2023). [↩]
6. J. Bedia, V. Muelas-Ramos, M. Peñas-Garzón , A. Gómez-Avilés, J. J. Rodríguez and C. Belve, A Review on the Synthesis and Characterization of Metal Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Water Purification, https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201811.0399/v1, (2018). [↩]
7. R. M. Rego, M. D. Kurkuri, M. Kigga, A comprehensive review on water remediation using UiO-66 MOFs and their derivatives https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653522013388, (2022). [↩] [↩] [↩]
8. Cryst. Growth Des, 20, 2, 1347–1362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103131, (2020). [↩] [↩]
9. M. Kadhom, M. Al-Furaiji, S. Salih, M. A. Al-Obaidi, G. H. Abdullah, N. Albayati, A review on UiO-66 applications in membrane-based water treatment processes, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214714422008467, (2023). [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩]
10. J. Cortes-Su ́arez, V. Celis-Arias, H. I. Beltran, A. Tejeda-Cruz, I. A. Ibarra, J. E. Romero-Ibarra, E. Sanchez-González, and S. Loera-Serna, Synthesis and Characterization of an SWCNT@HKUST‑1 Composite: Enhancing the CO2 Adsorption Properties of HKUST‑1, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.9b00330, (2019). [↩] [↩]
11. P. Goyal, A. Paruthi, D. Menon, R. Behara, A. Jaiswal, K. V, A. Kumar, V. Krishnan, S. K. Misra. Fe doped bimetallic HKUST-1 MOF with enhanced water stability for trapping Pb(II) with high adsorption capacity, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894721046647, (2018). [↩] [↩]
12. H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O’Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1230444, (2013). [↩] [↩]
13. M. A. Gotthardt, R. Schoch, S. Wolf, M. Bauer and W. Kleist. Synthesis and characterization of bimetallic metal–organic framework Cu–Ru-BTC with HKUST-1 structure, https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/dt/c4dt02491e#:~:text=Abstract,synthesis%20using%20mild%20reaction%20conditions, (2014). [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩] [↩]
14. W. Lu, Z. Wei, Z. Gu, T. Liu, J. Park, J. Park, J. Park, J. Tian, M. Zhang, Q. Zhang, T. Gentle III, M. Bosch, and H. Zhou. Tuning the structure and function of metal–organic frameworks via linker design, https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/cs/c4cs00003j, (2014). [↩] [↩] [↩]
15. A. Dakkak, Water Pollution Worries in Developing World, https://www.ecomena.org/water-pollution/, (2023) Cryst. Growth Des, 20, 2, 1347–1362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103131, (2020). [↩]