Abstract
Quantum computing (QC) is a transformative technology poised to revolutionize drug discovery and healthcare by overcoming the computational limitations of classical methods and artificial intelligence (AI). While AI has optimized drug development pipelines, it encounters challenges with molecular and quantum problems, such as modeling molecular interactions, protein folding, and simulating atomic-level quantum states, due to its reliance on approximations and extensive computational resources. This paper presents a systematic literature review to assess advancements in QC and its integration with AI. We review key areas including molecular simulations, quantum machine learning (QML), and combinatorial optimization. Our findings indicate that quantum algorithms can significantly enhance molecular simulations and improve the efficiency of drug discovery pipelines, while integration with AI reduces computational time and increases screening accuracy. Furthermore, emerging hybrid quantum-classical models and improved access to quantum resources hold the promise of driving innovations beyond the capabilities of classical technologies. Looking ahead, future research should address scalability challenges, error correction, and integration strategies to fully harness the synergistic potential of QC and AI in advancing personalized medicine and predictive modeling.
Keywords: Quantum computing, Artificial intelligence, Drug discovery, Quantum machine learning.
Introduction
Drug discovery is a time-intensive and resource-heavy process, often taking over a decade and billions of dollars to bring a single drug to market. Traditional computational methods, and more recently AI-driven approaches, have improved efficiency but remain constrained by the limits of classical computing. AI excels in pattern recognition, data analysis, and predictive modeling; however, when it comes to simulating highly complex molecular interactions, protein folding, and quantum mechanical processes, its approximations often fall short1.
AI has emerged as a powerful tool in this domain, contributing to tasks such as molecular property prediction, virtual screening, and de novo molecule generation. Deep learning models can extract meaningful patterns from large biomedical datasets, aiding in hit identification and optimization2. However, AI methods often rely on approximations and data quality, and they struggle with tasks involving quantum mechanical processes—such as protein folding, electron configuration, and molecular interactions—which are vital for accurate drug design.
QC offers a fundamentally different approach by leveraging qubits and quantum mechanical principles like superposition and entanglement to simulate nature at its most basic level. Unlike classical systems, quantum computers can model the behavior of molecules, atoms, and electrons with much higher fidelity. This opens new frontiers in predicting molecular properties, optimizing drug-target interactions, and understanding reaction mechanisms that are otherwise computationally intractable3
One of the most promising applications of QC is in quantum molecular simulations, where quantum algorithms like the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) are used to calculate molecular energy states and binding affinities more precisely than classical methods. Additionally, Quantum Machine Learning (QML), which merges QC with AI, enhances capabilities in virtual screening, molecular classification, and compound clustering by encoding molecular features into quantum states and accelerating model training and inference4.
Real-world applications are already emerging. For example, quantum-enhanced drug screening has been shown to improve solubility predictions and binding accuracy, while pharmaceutical companies are partnering with quantum technology firms to explore novel antibiotics and optimize clinical trial designs3.
Despite this potential, challenges remain. Current quantum hardware is in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, with limited coherence, error rates, and scalability. Furthermore, integrating quantum models into existing drug pipelines, addressing security and privacy concerns, and developing reliable hybrid quantum-classical frameworks are active areas of research.
This manuscript presents a systematic review of recent advances at the intersection of Quantum Computing and AI in drug discovery, Using the PRISMA framework (see Methods and Figure 1), we synthesize findings from peer-reviewed literature (2021–2024) to provide a clear perspective on current progress, real-world impact, and future directions in this emerging field.
Glossary of Terms
- Quantum Computing (QC): A computing paradigm that exploits quantum mechanics principles—such as superposition and entanglement—to perform calculations beyond the reach of classical computers.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI): A field focused on creating systems that perform tasks requiring human-like intelligence, including learning, reasoning, and problem-solving.
- Machine Learning (ML): A subset of AI that uses statistical techniques and algorithms to improve task performance through experience.
- Quantum Machine Learning (QML): The combination of quantum computing and machine learning to achieve computational efficiencies and solve problems infeasible for classical ML.
- Molecular Docking: A computational method used to predict the interaction between a drug candidate and its biological target at the atomic level.
- Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE): A quantum algorithm designed to approximate the lowest eigenvalue of a Hamiltonian, useful in molecular modeling and energy calculations.
- Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE): An algorithm for determining eigenvalues of unitary operators, critical for simulating molecular interactions.
- Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): A quantum-enhanced version of GANs that employ a pair of neural networks to generate data indistinguishable from real datasets.
- Qubit: The fundamental unit of quantum information, capable of representing a superposition of states.
- Protein Folding: The process by which a protein achieves its functional three-dimensional structure, a key factor in understanding disease mechanisms.
- Gibbs Free Energy: A thermodynamic metric used to assess the feasibility of chemical reactions, particularly in drug binding studies.
- Hybrid Quantum-Classical Systems: Systems that integrate quantum algorithms for specific tasks with classical computing, leveraging the strengths of both.
- Qubit Stability: The capacity of a qubit to maintain its quantum state over time, essential for reliable quantum computation.
- Error Correction in Quantum Computing: Techniques to detect and correct errors in quantum computations, vital due to qubits’ susceptibility to noise.
- Personalized Medicine: A medical approach that customizes treatment based on individual patient characteristics.
- Biomarkers: Measurable biological indicators used to diagnose diseases or predict treatment responses.
- Molecular Simulations: Computational methods for modeling molecular behavior and interactions to inform drug development.
- Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs): Neural network models that leverage quantum computing for enhanced learning, especially in high-dimensional datasets.
- Quantum Simulations (QS): The use of quantum algorithms to replicate complex quantum systems such as molecular interactions or material properties.
Results
The analysis of key research papers on the application of Advancing Drug Discovery with Quantum Computing Breaking Artificial Intelligence Barriers is summarized in Table 1. Categorized by authors, year of publication, focus area, methodology, and key findings, the table highlights the diverse applications of quantum technologies across precision medicine, molecular simulations, and hybrid quantum-classical models.
Table 1. Overview of Key Studies
Author | Focus Area | Method/Metric | Key Findings | Study Limitations and Critical Trends |
Thomas J.S. Durant et al.5Thomas J.S. Durant et al.5 | QC in Healthcare and Biomedical Research | Quantum algorithms for protein folding, genomics, and drug discovery; scalability, error correction | Accelerates complex biological data analysis; challenges in accessibility and error correction persist. | QC in healthcare is currently limited by scalability, error correction, and practical application challenges, yet trends in cloud accessibility and interdisciplinary collaboration are driving its future advancement |
Thulasi Bikku et al.6 | Improved Quantum Algorithms for Drug Discovery | Performance evaluation with datasets like PubChem, BindingDB using accuracy, precision, F1-score | Enhanced simulation of molecular interactions with improved scalability. | Quantum algorithms revolutionize drug discovery with precise molecular simulations, but overcoming noise, scalability, and design challenges remains key. |
Junde Li, Rasit O. Topaloglu, Swaroop Ghosh7 | Quantum Generative Models for Small Molecule Drug Discovery | Hybrid Quantum GAN (QGAN-HG) with qubit-efficient learning and classical discriminator | Reduces training time while maintaining accuracy in molecular generation. | Quantum generative models promise faster, parameter-efficient drug discovery yet remain constrained by qubit limits and reduced expressive power, driving a critical trend toward hybrid architectures. |
Maria Avramouli et al.8 | Unlocking the Potential of Quantum Machine Learning to Advance Drug Discovery | Comparison of QML with classical methods for early drug discovery stages | QML shows promise for novel molecule identification; hybrid approaches recommended. | Quantum machine learning for drug discovery is limited by hardware noise and scarce qubits, yet hybrid quantum–classical strategies and rapid algorithm advances are critical trends driving its potential |
Olawale Ayoade, Pablo Rivas, Javier Orduz9 | Artificial Intelligence Computing at the Quantum Level | Quantum computing models and metrics for AI integration | Indicates potential for advancing AI through quantum methods. | Quantum computing in medicine faces significant challenges like hardware noise, limited qubits, and integration issues, yet ongoing advances in hybrid systems and error correction herald transformative clinical applications |
Alexey Pyrkov, Alex Aliper, Dmitry Bezrukov, Yen-Chu Lin, Daniil Polykovskiy, Petrina Kamya, Feng Ren, Alex Zhavoronkov10 | Quantum computing for generative chemistry and drug discovery | Integration of NISQ devices, quantum algorithms (VQE, QAOA, QML), hybrid classical-quantum pipelines | Outperforms classical generative models; near-term applications viable via NISQ devices. | Despite current hardware limitations, rapid progress in quantum algorithms and NISQ devices is driving promising advances in generative chemistry and drug discovery. |
Bhushan Bonde, Pratik Patil, and Bhaskar Choubey11 | Quantum computing in drug discovery and healthcare | Examination of quantum computing’s potential beyond traditional AI methods | Demonstrates faster and more accurate simulations for complex drug discovery challenges. | Key challenges include limited simulation timescales, lack of mechanistic insights in AI, and gaps in clinical validation. AI-physics integration, digital twins, and high-performance computing are driving progress in biomedicine. |
Heidari et al.12 | Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) classifier for predicting treatment response in knee osteoarthritis | Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) classifier for predicting treatment response in knee osteoarthritis | Shows reduced computational complexity and improved predictive accuracy; further validation required. | Quantum machine learning shows promise, but limited data, a single treatment type, and basic disease grading highlight the need for broader validation and model improvement. |
Blunt et al.1313 | Quantum Computing in Drug Design | Quantum Phase Estimation and Qubitization for molecular simulations | Dramatically reduces simulation runtimes; strong evidence of fast progress. | Quantum computing holds promise for drug discovery, but current limits in hardware and error correction keep applications mostly experimental. |
Baiardi et al.14 | Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology | Analysis of quantum effects in molecular structures and simulations | Highlights potential advantages for biomolecular processes; practical constraints remain. | Quantum computing in molecular biology faces hardware limits, but hybrid methods show promise for future progress. |
Avramouli et al.15 | Quantum Machine Learning in Drug Discovery | Hybrid quantum-classical approaches for ML in drug pipelines | Identifies critical stages for quantum intervention; practical implementation limited by current technology. | Quantum machine learning in drug discovery faces hardware and data challenges, but hybrid models offer promise. |
Bertil Schmidt, Andreas Hildebrandt16 | Drug discovery acceleration using GPUs, AI, and quantum computing | Identification of three waves: GPUs, AI, and QC for bioinformatics | QC promises breakthroughs by handling complex datasets and improving overall efficiency. | Quantum computing in bioinformatics shows promise but remains limited by current hardware capabilities, while AI and GPUs continue to drive rapid, practical progress. |
Soumen Pal et al.17 | Quantum computing in molecular biology | Quantum algorithms like Grover’s and hardware components like QPU | Demonstrates potential for significant speedups in protein folding and drug discovery tasks. | Quantum computing in biology faces major hardware, error correction, and scalability challenges, but emerging algorithms and hybrid models offer promising paths forward. |
Phuong-Nam Nguyen18 | Biomarker discovery using Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) | Maximum Relevance-Minimum Redundancy, Quantum AI | Identifies novel biomarkers in CTLA4 pathways; suggests efficient genomic research applications. | Quantum AI shows promise for biomarker discovery, but current limitations include noisy quantum hardware and lack of in vivo validation, while future trends point to integrating epigenetic data and deploying on real quantum systems. |
Katarzyna Nałęcz-Charkiewicz et al19 | QC in bioinformatics mapping | Systematic review mapping QC applications in bioinformatics | Highlights scalability and efficiency in genome sequencing and molecular simulations. | Quantum neural networks show promise for biomarker discovery, but current hardware limitations and the need for in vivo validation remain key challenges, with future trends focusing on integrating epigenetic data and real quantum deployment. |
Weitang Li et al20 | Hybrid QC pipeline for drug discovery | Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), hybrid classical-quantum methods | Successfully models drug design scenarios with quantum advantages in energy calculations. | While the proposed hybrid quantum pipeline shows strong potential for real-world drug discovery, current limitations in quantum hardware performance and circuit depth still constrain its full scalability and accuracy. |
Anna Lappala21 | Integration of QC and AI in molecular dynamics (MD) | Quantum-assisted MD simulations, ML-integrated predictive force fields | Enhances simulation precision, providing insights into molecular mechanisms for drug discovery. | Quantum computing in drug discovery shows strong potential, but is currently limited by hardware noise, shallow circuit depth, and high computation times, while trends point toward scalable hybrid pipelines and improved algorithms. |
Ullah & Garcia-Zapirain22 | Quantum Machine Learning in Healthcare | Systematic review of quantum machine learning (QML) approaches in healthcare | Shows promise in diagnostics and imaging; challenges in scalability and real-world applications. real-world dataset applications. | Quantum machine learning in healthcare holds great promise, but faces current limitations in quantum hardware, data encoding, and noise, with future trends pointing toward hybrid models and enhanced real-world applications. |
Shuford23 | Synergies of Quantum Computing and AI in Networking & Security | Analysis of advancements in quantum systems and algorithms (e.g., Shor’s Algorithm, Grover’s Algorithm) | Enhances data encryption/decryption efficiency and offers scalable AI application potential. | Quantum computing and AI face key limitations in hardware scalability, decoherence, and practical implementation, while trends point toward hybrid quantum-classical approaches and advanced encryption systems. |
These studies underscore the transformative potential of quantum computing (QC) and its integration with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in addressing computational challenges in diagnostics, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. The collaboration between these technologies addresses the limitations of traditional AI models while offering novel approaches to precision medicine and drug development24.
Overcoming AI Limitations in Drug Discovery: AI has excelled in areas like pattern recognition, data analysis, and predictive modeling. However, it faces significant constraints when simulating quantum mechanical systems, such as molecular interactions and protein folding. AI approaches often rely on approximations that limit their accuracy, and their dependence on extensive computational resources makes scalability difficult for intricate tasks like molecular docking and optimization25. QC provides solutions to these limitations by enabling direct simulations of quantum interactions, significantly improving precision and reducing errors26.
Quantum-AI Synergies in Drug Discovery: The integration of QC and AI enhances the drug discovery pipeline by enabling precise simulations of quantum interactions and streamlining optimization processes. Shuford26 highlighted the utility of quantum algorithms such as Grover’s and Shor’s for accelerating molecular simulations and identifying potential drug candidates. Quantum annealers and simulators further extend the scalability of AI applications, improving both throughput and precision in compound screening.
Enhanced Molecular Simulations: Quantum algorithms like the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) have advanced the precision and efficiency of molecular simulations. These methods excel in simulating protein folding and identifying drug candidates, drastically reducing the time and computational resources required for these processes. Pal et al.25 demonstrated QC’s ability to provide high-fidelity simulations of biomolecular interactions, offering insights beyond the capabilities of classical computational models.
Advancements in Quantum Generative Models: Quantum-enhanced generative adversarial networks (GANs) are proving to be a significant innovation in molecular design. By reducing training times and improving accuracy, these models generate superior molecular structures for drug design. Such advancements position QC-driven generative models as transformative tools for innovation in the pharmaceutical industry24
Challenges in Quantum Implementation: Despite its promise, QC faces hurdles such as qubit stability, error correction, and hardware scalability. Limited access to high-fidelity quantum resources and comprehensive real-world datasets restricts its immediate application. Avramouli et al.27 emphasized the importance of developing robust error correction techniques and expanding datasets to accelerate the adoption of hybrid quantum-classical systems.
Discussion
Quantum computing offers unprecedented capabilities to address the inherent limitations of traditional AI approaches in drug discovery. By enabling high-fidelity simulations of molecular interactions, QC bypasses many of the approximations and resource constraints that limit classical AI methods. This integration of QC and AI has revolutionized critical stages of drug discovery, such as molecular docking, ligand optimization, and high-throughput screening.
Our review highlights several key themes:
- Overcoming AI Limitations: AI excels in data-driven tasks but struggles with simulating quantum mechanical processes. QC’s ability to directly model quantum interactions provide a more accurate representation of molecular behavior, as demonstrated by studies employing VQE and QPE algorithms.
- Quantum-AI Synergies: The hybrid integration of QC and AI not only accelerates drug discovery pipelines but also improves the precision of compound screening. Quantum-enhanced models such as QNNs have shown potential in reducing computational complexity and increasing predictive accuracy, particularly in personalized medicine.
- Enhanced Molecular Simulations: Advanced quantum algorithms offer the potential to drastically reduce simulation times and computational costs. Empirical evidence from multiple studies indicates significant speedups compared to classical simulations, although hardware limitations currently constrain large-scale practical applications.
- Advancements in Generative Models: Quantum generative adversarial networks (GANs) have emerged as powerful tools for molecular design, reducing training times while maintaining high accuracy. However, further validation and real-world testing remain necessary.
- Challenges and Future Directions: Despite its promise, QC faces hurdles such as qubit fidelity, error correction, and scalability. Our review suggests that near-term applications may emerge with NISQ-era devices, while long-term breakthroughs will depend on robust error-correction methods and expanded access to high-fidelity quantum resources. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with advanced classical methods (e.g., deep learning models like AlphaFold) reveals that while QC offers clear theoretical advantages, empirical validation in real-world drug discovery is still evolving. Our review suggests that near-term applications may emerge with NISQ-era devices, while long-term breakthroughs will depend on robust error-correction methods and expanded access to high-fidelity quantum resources
Overall, the convergence of QC, AI, and healthcare signals a promising frontier for drug discovery, albeit one that requires continued research, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and careful consideration of data security and ethical standards.
Conclusion
In summary, our systematic review underscores the transformative potential of integrating quantum computing with artificial intelligence in drug discovery. While QC offers significant advantages in precision and speed for molecular simulations and predictive modeling, current limitations, such as hardware constraints and error correction challenges, necessitate further research. Future studies should aim to bridge the gap between experimental quantum applications and real-world clinical implementations. The evolving synergy of QC and AI promises to drive the next wave of innovation in pharmaceutical research, but it must be coupled with robust regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines to fully realize its potential.
Methods
A structured protocol was adopted to ensure a comprehensive literature review of QC and AI applications in drug discovery. The review process was guided by the PRISMA framework (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), as illustrated in Figure 1 (flowchart). The steps are summarized as follows:
Search Strategy
- Databases: PubMed and Google Scholar were primarily used.
- Keywords & Boolean Operators: Terms such as “Quantum computing and Artificial Intelligence,” “Quantum computing and drug discovery,” and “Drug discovery and quantum machine learning” were combined using Boolean operators.
- Publication Criteria: The search was limited to English-language articles published between 2021 and 2024. Studies were excluded if they were review articles, non-English publications, outside the defined scope, or unavailable in the specified databases.
Screening and Selection
- Initial Screening: Titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance.
- Eligibility: Full-text assessments were conducted, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria based on study objectives, methodology, and relevance to QC applications in drug discovery.
- Data Extraction: Key data, such as study objectives, methods, findings, and challenges were systematically extracted from each study.
- Data Synthesis:Extracted data were synthesized into thematic categories, including molecular simulations, QML, and combinatorial optimization. This synthesis enabled a critical evaluation of common trends, breakthroughs, and limitations across the literature.
- Quality Assurance: Only peer-reviewed articles are included, with a focus on the most recent advancements (predominantly from the past two years).
References
- E. Barkoudah. Exploring the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computing in Healthcare: An In-Depth Analysis. https://ebrahimbarkoudahmdmph.substack.com/p/exploring-theintersection-of-artificial-ad7 [Internet]. 2024; Available from: https://ebrahimbarkoudahmdmph.substack.com/p/exploring-the-intersection-of-artificial-ad7?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web (2024). [↩]
- A.Blanco-González, A.Cabezón, A.Seco-González, D.Conde-Torres, P.Antelo-Riveiro, A.Piñeiro, et al. The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies. Pharmaceuticals [Internet]. 2023; 16(6):891. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/16/6/891 (2023). [↩]
- G.Kumar, S.Yadav, A.Mukherjee, V. Hassija, M.Guizani. Recent Advances in Quantum Computing for Drug Discovery and Development. IEEE Access [Internet]. 2024;12:64491–509. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10466774/ (2024). [↩] [↩]
- B.Lau, PS.Emani, J.Chapman, L Yao, T.Lam, P.Merrill, et al. Insights from incorporating quantum computing into drug design workflows. Martelli PL, editor. Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2023 ];39(1):btac789. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac789/6881079 (2023). [↩]
- T. J. S. Durant et al. A primer for quantum computing and its applications to healthcare and biomedical research J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1774–1784 doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae149 (2024). [↩]
- T. Bikku, K. K. Malligunta, S. Thota, and P. P. Surapaneni. Improved Quantum Algorithm: A Crucial Stepping Stone in Quantum-Powered Drug Discovery. J. Electron. Mater. doi: 10.1007/s11664-024-11275-7 (2024). [↩]
- J. Li, R. O. Topaloglu, and S. Ghosh. Quantum Generative Models for Small Molecule Drug Discovery. IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng., vol. 2, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TQE.2021.3104804 (2021). [↩]
- M. Avramouli, I. K. Savvas, A. Vasilaki, and G. Garani. Unlocking the Potential of Quantum Machine Learning to Advance Drug Discovery. Electronics, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 2402, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12112402 (2023). [↩]
- O. Ayoade, P. Rivas, and J. Orduz. Artificial Intelligence Computing at the Quantum Level. Data, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 28, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/data7030028 (2022). [↩]
- A. Pyrkov et al. Quantum computing for near-term applications in generative chemistry and drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today, vol. 28, no. 8, p. 103675, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103675 (2023). [↩]
- B. Bonde, P. Patil, and B. Choubey. The Future of Drug Development with Quantum Computing High Performance Computing for Drug Discovery and Biomedicine, vol. 2716, A. Heifetz, Ed., in Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 2716. , New York, NY: Springer US, 2024, pp. 153–179. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3_7 (2024). [↩]
- N. Heidari et al. A Quantum-Enhanced Precision Medicine Application to Support Data-Driven Clinical Decisions for the Personalized Treatment of Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: The Development and Preliminary Validation of precision KNEE_QNN. Cureus, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.7759/cureus.52093 (2024). [↩]
- N. S. Blunt et al. Perspective on the Current State-of-the-Art of Quantum Computing for Drug Discovery Applications. J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 7001–7023, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00574.(2022). [↩]
- A. Baiardi, M. Christandl, and M. Reiher. Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology**. ChemBioChem, vol. 24, no. 13, p. e202300120, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1002/cbic.202300120 (2023). [↩]
- M. Avramouli, I. Savvas, A. Vasilaki, G. Garani, and A. Xenakis. Quantum Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: Current State and Challenges. Proceedings of the 26th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Athens Greece: ACM, Nov. 2022, pp. 394–401. doi: 10.1145/3575879.3576024 (2022). [↩]
- B. Schmidt and A. Hildebrandt. From GPUs to AI and quantum: three waves of acceleration in bioinformatics. Drug Discov. Today, vol. 29, no. 6, p. 103990, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103990 (2024). [↩]
- S. Pal, M. Bhattacharya, S.-S. Lee, and C. Chakraborty. Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics Mol. Biotechnol., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 163–178, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12033-023-00765-4 (2024). [↩]
- P.-N. Nguyen. Biomarker discovery with quantum neural networks. A case-study in CTLA4-activation pathways, BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 149, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05755-0. (2024). [↩]
- K. Nałęcz-Charkiewicz, K. Charkiewicz, and R. M. Nowak. Quantum computing in bioinformatics: a systematic review mapping. Brief. Bioinform., vol. 25, no. 5, p. bbae391, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae391 (2024). [↩]
- W. Li et al. A hybrid quantum computing pipeline for real world drug discovery Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16942, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67897-8. (2024). [↩]
- A. Lappala. The next revolution in computational simulations: Harnessing AI and quantum computing in molecular dynamics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., vol. 89, p. 102919, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102919 (2024). [↩]
- U. Ullah and B. Garcia-Zapirain. Quantum Machine Learning Revolution in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Emerging Perspectives and Applications. IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 11423–11450, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3353461 (2024). [↩]
- J. Shuford. Quantum Computing and Artificial Intelligence: Synergies and Challenges. J. Artif. Intell. Gen. Sci. JAIGS ISSN3006-4023, vol. 1, no. 1, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.60087/jaigs.v1i1.35 (2024). [↩]
- U. Ullah and B. Garcia-Zapirain. Quantum Machine Learning Revolution in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Emerging Perspectives and Applications. IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 11423–11450, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3353461 (2024). [↩] [↩]
- S. Pal, M. Bhattacharya, S.-S. Lee, and C. Chakraborty. Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics Mol. Biotechnol., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 163–178, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12033-023-00765-4 (2024). [↩] [↩]
- J. Shuford. Quantum Computing and Artificial Intelligence: Synergies and Challenges. J. Artif. Intell. Gen. Sci. JAIGS ISSN3006-4023, vol. 1, no. 1, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.60087/jaigs.v1i1.35 (2024). [↩] [↩]
- M. Avramouli, I. Savvas, A. Vasilaki, G. Garani, and A. Xenakis. Quantum Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: Current State and Challenges. Proceedings of the 26th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Athens Greece: ACM, Nov. 2022, pp. 394–401. doi: 10.1145/3575879.3576024 (2022). [↩]