Table 1. Percent Individuals Clean for Head, Thorax, and Gaster at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes.
Comparing Rates of Cleaning Between Smooth and Ridged Species. Because only three of the six P. badius tested with 25 nestmates were able to clean the head, all species are evaluated for the first three individuals with 25 nestmates to clean the head. The average time for the first three individuals is shown in Table 2. Smooth species — C. chromaiodes and S. invicta — are shown to clean the head at an average of 22.5 minutes. Ridged species – A. rudis and P. badius – are shown to clean the head at an average time of 50 minutes. The average time for the first three individuals to clean the head is 36.25 minutes. A Chi Square test was used to compare the % clean after 36.25 minutes between smooth and ridged species. The chi-square statistic is 5.952. The p-value is .0147. This result is significant at p < .05. (Formula 1)
Table 2. Time for six individuals with 25 nestmates to clean head.
Figure 6. Comparing rates of head grooming between smooth and ridged species.
Table 4. Chi Square Statistic Comparing Cleaning Efficiency for Smooth and Ridged Species. The p-value indicates that the hypothesis that ant species with smooth exoskeletons clean faster than species with ridged exoskeletons was supported.
Table 5. Chi Square Statistic Comparing Cleaning Ability for Individuals with 10 and with 25 Nestmates. The p-value indicates that the hypothesis that ants with a larger group of nestmates clean faster was supported.
Discussion:
All species cleaned body segments in a specific order: first the head, then the gaster, ending with the thorax. It may be that the priority of each body segment correlates to the necessity of its function. Although the thorax was cleaned last on each species, many never achieved a state of 95% clean. This may be due to the location of leg joints on the thorax. Across all species at all time points for all segments, the groups with twenty-five individuals are clean more often than groups with ten individuals. Across all species at all time points for all segments, the groups with twenty-five individuals are clean more often than groups with ten individuals.
The large amount of trials necessary to produce usable data required a more rudimentary method of determining when the ants were clean. Further experimentation could be done by freezing the individuals which were originally coated in pink talc. The heads could then be removed from the ants and the antennae removed from the head for imaging. A similar process was used to produce the images in Figure 1. These images may yield a more accurate statistical analysis.
Furthermore, the ants were allowed to adjust to the test environment in the plastered petri dishes for about thirty minutes before the talcum covered ant was introduced. Red-light filters were also placed on top to simulate the low-light conditions of the colony. The more similar the test environment is to the ants familiar habitat, the more similar its behavior will be. Thus, further experiments may consider leaving the ants in the test environment for a longer period of time to further adjust to their natural behaviors.
A greater difference in cleaning ability between individuals with 25 nestmates and individuals with 10 nestmates shows a greater reliance on allogrooming behaviors. A chi square test was used to determine statistical significance. The p-value is less than 0.0001 indicating statistical significance for p < .05. Thus, it is observed that allogrooming did occur and increased when the individual was placed with 25 nestmates instead of 10.
Because the head was cleaned first, ratios of the percentage of 25 groups clean to the percentage of 10 groups clean were compared for the head at 120 minutes. A. Rudis shows the highest ratio with a 6:1 difference between groups of 25 and groups of 10. S. Invicta is the next highest with a ratio of 3:1, followed by P. Badius and C. Chromaiodes which both show a ratio of 3:2. Only C. Chromaiodes and S. Invicta, both of which are smooth species, have groups which are clean in the 15-minute time point. Across all species, 87.5% of individuals with 25 nestmates show a clean head at 120 minutes. 37.5% of individuals with 10 nestmates show a clean head at 120 minutes. Thus, grooming rates increase by 233% when individual worker ants are placed with 25 nestmates instead of 10 nestmates. This shows that allogrooming is present. Further, all groups show that the head is cleaned first. Thus, in order to make comparisons between species, the head of groups with 25 individuals were compared at 120 minutes. Both A. Rudis and S. Invicta showed higher 25 group to 10 group ratios compared to the P. Badius and C. Chromaiodes groups. A. Rudis and S. Invicta also share a similar average size of around 0.5 cm, while P. Badius and C. Chromaiodes share an average size of around 1.5 cm. Thus, the two smaller species had a greater deviation between the 25 group and the 10 group, indicating a greater reliance on allogrooming
As it relates to the morphology of the exoskeleton, the smooth species – C. Chromaiodes and S. Invicta – were clean at earlier time points in comparison to ridged species – P. Badius and A. Rudis. Thus, it may be that small, smooth ants are ideally fit for allogrooming success. The higher deviation between groups with 25 individuals and groups with 10 individuals for A. Rudis and S. Invicta species suggests there may be a higher critical number of nest mates to maintain colony health in ant species with a smaller average size. A Chi Square comparing smooth and ridged cleaning efficiency was calculated using the percentage of heads clean before the average cleaning time of 36.25 minutes.
The null hypothesis states that smooth and ridged species would achieve 95-100% clean head at the same time. However, data shows that while 50% of smooth individuals had cleaned the head before 36.25 minutes, only 33.3% of ridged individuals had. The p-value is 0.0147 indicating statistical significance for p < .05. Thus, the hypothesis that ant species with smooth exoskeletons would clean faster than those with ridged exoskeletons was supported.
Figure 1. Comparing C. Chromaiodes (left) and P. Badius (right) Exoskeleton morphology after dusting with talc powder and brushing 20 times
Figure 2. Artificial P. Badius Colony
Figure 3. C. Chromaiodes Groups of 10 (left) and 25 (right) in Test Dishes before adding red light filter. Individual coated in pink talc identified by arrow.
Figure 4. Comparing allogrooming and self-grooming activities.
Figure 5. Phenylacetic Acid
References
- Theis, Fabian J., and Line V. Ugelvig. “Opposing Effects of Allogrooming on Disease Transmission in Ant Societies.” Royal Society Publishing. The Royal Society, 13 Apr. 2015. Web. 04 Oct. 2016.
- Holldobler, Bert, and Hiltrud Engel-Sigul. “On the Metapleural Gland of Ants.”AntBase. Harvard University Dept. of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 1984. Web. 4 Oct. 2016.
- Trimble, Jane E. “Antimicrobial Properties of Secretions from the Metapleural Glands of Myrmecia Gulosa.” Wiley Online Library. Journal of Applied Microbiology, Mar. 1992. Web.
- MacGown. “Aphaenogaster Rudis.” NorthWoods. Skidmore, Apr. 2008. Web. 04 Oct. 2016.
- Laura Collins and Rudolf H. Scheffrahn2. “Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis Invicta Buren (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae).” EDIS New Publications RSS. Entomology and Nematology, n.d. Web. 04 Oct. 2016.
- Eaton, Eric. “Species Camponotus Chromaiodes – Ferruginous Carpenter Ant.” Iowa State Dept. of Entymology. Iowa State University, May 2008. Web. 04 Oct. 2016.
Acknowledgements:
I would like to acknowledge NC State University and the staff in the Animal Behavior lab at the North Carolina Nature Research Center. I would like to further acknowledge Dr. Mary Jane Epps and Dr. Rob Dunn for giving me my start in animal behavior research in 2014.
Raw Data: Table 3. Raw Data. X= 95-100% clean at each time point| Species | Group size | 15mins (H, T, G) | 30mins (H, T, G) | 60mins (H, T, G) | 90mins (H, T, G) | 120mins (H, T, G) | ||||||||||
| Aphaenogaster Rudis | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Pogonomyrmex badius | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Pogonomyrmex badius | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Pogonomyrmex badius | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | ||||||||||||||
| Pogonomyrmex badius | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Pogonomyrmex badius | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Pogonomyrmex badius | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | ||||||||||||||
| Camponotus Chromaiodes | 10 | X | X | |||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Solenopsis Invicta | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Camponotus Chromaiodes | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Camponotus Chromaiodes | 10 | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
| Solenopsis Invicta | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Solenopsis Invicta | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Solenopsis Invicta | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Aphaenogaster Rudis | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | ||||||||||||||
| Aphaenogaster Rudis | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Aphaenogaster Rudis | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Aphaenogaster Rudis | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
| Camponotus Chromaiodes | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Camponotus Chromaiodes | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | ||||||||||||||
| Camponotus Chromaiodes | 10 | X | X | |||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
| Aphaenogaster Rudis | 10 | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
| Solenopsis Invicta | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Solenopsis Invicta | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
| Aphaenogaster Rudis | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Solenopsis Invicta | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Camponotus Chromaiodes | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Pogonomyrmex badius | 10 | X | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | X | X | ||||||||||||||




Quality articles is the main to be a focus for the viewers to pay a quick visit the web site, that’s what this web site is providing.
Quality articles is the crucial to be a focus for the users to visit the web page, that’s what this site is providing.